ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Relevance search and anomaly detection in bipartite graphs
Full text PdfPdf (326 KB)
Source ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter archive
Volume 7 ,  Issue 2  (December 2005) table of contents
Pages: 48 - 55  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1931-0145
Authors
Jimeng Sun  Carnegie Mellon Univ.
Huiming Qu  Univ. of Pittsburgh
Deepayan Chakrabarti  Yahoo! Research
Christos Faloutsos  Univ. of Pittsburgh
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1117454.1117461
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many real applications can be modeled using bipartite graphs, such as users vs. files in a P2P system, traders vs. stocks in a financial trading system, conferences vs. authors in a scientific publication network, and so on. We introduce two operations on bipartite graphs: 1) identifying similar nodes (relevance search), and 2) finding nodes connecting irrelevant nodes (anomaly detection). And we propose algorithms to compute the relevance score for each node using random walk with restarts and graph partitioning; we also propose algorithms to identify anomalies, using relevance scores. We evaluate the quality of relevance search based on semantics of the datasets, and we also measure the performance of the anomaly detection algorithm with manually injected anomalies. Both effectiveness and efficiency of the methods are confirmed by experiments on several real datasets.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
J. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In UAI, 1998.
 
3
 
4
5
6
 
7
Gary William Flake, Steve Lawrence, and C. Lee Giles. Efficient identification of Web communities. In KDD, 2000.
 
8
M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, volume 99, 2002.
9
 
10
Taher H. Haveliwala and Sepandar D. Kamvar. The second eigenvalue of the google matrix. Stanford University Technical Report, 2003.
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Stefan Klink, Michael Ley, Emma Rabbidge, Patrick Reuther, Bernd Walter, and Alexander Weber. Browsing and visualizing digital bibliographic data. In VisSym, pages 237--242, 2004.
15
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
Gilbert Strang. Introduction to Linear Algebra. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, 3 edition, 1998.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jimeng Sun: colleagues
Huiming Qu: colleagues
Deepayan Chakrabarti: colleagues
Christos Faloutsos: colleagues