| Impact of interconnect resistance increase on system performance of low power and high performance designs |
| Full text |
Pdf
(177 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Workshop on System-Level Interconnect Prediction
archive
Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on System-level interconnect prediction
table of contents
Munich, Germany
SESSION: Physical interconnect analysis and optimization
table of contents
Pages: 85 - 90
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-255-0
|
|
Authors
|
|
Mandeep Bamal
|
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
|
|
Youssef Travaly
|
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium
|
|
Wenqi Zhang
|
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
|
|
Michele Stucchi
|
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium
|
|
Karen Maex
|
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 21, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The scaling of Cu/Low-k interconnects into the deep submicron (DSM) regime is characterized by a significant increase in resistance. This increase is caused by geometrical scaling of interconnect dimensions, the non-scalability of high resistivity diffusion barrier and the resistivity increase due to surface and grain-boundary scattering of charge carrying electrons. The resistance of interconnects impacts the delay of the circuits and consequently the performance of chips. We investigate the impact of this phenomenon on system level performance for low power and high performance applications. It results that (a) it is important to consider the resistivity increase early in design phase to maximize the performance of the chips and (b) it is possible to optimally trade-off between various metrics of interest such as clock frequency, chip energy and chip area by exploring the freedom in choosing different interconnect process technology options.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
K. Fuchs, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 34,100, 1938
|
| |
2
|
E.H. Sondheimer, Adv. Phys. 1, 1, 1952
|
| |
3
|
F. Mayadas & M. Shatzkes, Phys. Rev. B, 1, 1382, 1970
|
| |
4
|
International technology roadmap for semiconductors, 2004.
|
| |
5
|
J.D. Meindl, "Low power microelectronics: Retrospective and prospect", Proc. IEEE, vol. 83, pp. 619--635, Apr. 1995.
|
| |
6
|
H. B. Bakoglu, Circuits, Interconnections and packaging for VLSI, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1990.
|
| |
7
|
G. A. Sai-Halaz, "Performance trends in high-end microprocessors",Proc. IEEE vol. 83, pp. 20--36, Jan. 1995.
|
| |
8
|
R. Sarvari et al."Impact of Size Effects on the Resistivity of Copper Wires and Consequently the Design and Performance of Metal Interconnect Networks", IITC 2005.
|
| |
9
|
V.H. Nguyen et al."An Analysis of the Effect of Wire Resistance on Circuit Level Performance at the 45-nm Technology Node", IITC 2005.
|
| |
10
|
Raphael - Interconnect analysis program, Synopsys, 2003.
|
| |
11
|
J. A. Davis et al.,"A stochastic wire-length distribution for gigascale integration (GSI)-parts I and II", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol 45, pp. 580--597, March. 1998.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
R. B. Dingle, Proc. Roy. Soc., 62, 77 (1949).
|
| |
16
|
Y. Travaly and M. Bamal et al. "A novel approach to resistivity and interconnect modeling", submitted to MAM2006.
|
| |
17
|
P. Kapur, J. Mc. Vittie, K. C. Saraswat, IEEE Trans. on electron devices, Vo. 49, No. 4, p. 590, 2002.
|
|