ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Performance benefits of monolithically stacked 3D-FPGA
Full text PdfPdf (268 KB)
Source International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/SIGDA 14th international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays table of contents
Monterey, California, USA
SESSION: Emerging Technologies table of contents
Pages: 113 - 122  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-292-5
Authors
Mingjie Lin  Stanford University, CA
Abbas El Gamal  Stanford University, CA
Yi-Chang Lu  Stanford University, CA
Simon Wong  Stanford University, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 103,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1117201.1117219
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The performance benefits of a monolithically stacked 3D-FPGA, whereby the programming overhead of an FPGA is stacked on top of a standard CMOS layer containing the logic blocks and interconnects, are investigated. A Virtex-II style 2D-FPGA fabric is used as a baseline for quantifying the relative improvements in logic density, delay, and power consumption achieved by such a 3D-FPGA. It is assumed that only the pass-transistor switches and configuration memory cells can be moved to the top layers and that the 3D-FPGA employs the same logic block and programmable interconnect architecture as the baseline 2D-FPGA. Assuming a configuration memory cell that is ≤ 0.7 the area of an SRAM cell and pass-transistor switches having the same characteristics as nMOS devices in the CMOS layer are used, it is shown that a monolithically stacked 3D-FPGA can achieve 3.2 times higher logic density, 1.7 times lower critical path delay, and 1.7 times lower total dynamic power consumption than the baseline 2D-FPGA fabricated in the same 65nm technology node.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
V. George, Low Energy Field-Programmable Gate Array PhD thesis, UC Berkeley, 2000.
 
2
3
4
 
5
V. Degalahal and T. Tuan, "Methodology for high level estimation of FPGA power consumption," in Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference pp. 657--660, Jan. 2005.
6
 
7
J. Burns, L. McIlrath, J. Hopwood, C. Keast, D. Vu, K. Warner, and P. Wyatt, "An SOI-based three-dimensional integrated circuit technology," in Proceedings of the SOI Conference pp. 20--21, Oct. 2000.
 
8
J. Burns, L. McIlrath, C. Keast, C. Lewis, A. Loomis, K. Warner, and P. Wyatt, "Three-dimensional integrated circuits for low-power, high-bandwidth systems on a chip," in Proceedings of the Solid-State Circuits Conference pp. 268--269, Feb 2001.
 
9
A. R. Joshi and K. C. Saraswat, "Nickel induced crystallization of a-Sigate electrode at 500C and MOS capacitor reliability," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices vol. 50, pp.1058--1062, April 2003.
 
10
M. Cao, T. Zhao, K. C. Saraswat, and J. D. Plummer, "A simple EEPROM cell using polysilicon thin film transistors," IEEE Electron Device Letter vol.15, pp. 304--306, Aug. 1994.
 
11
S. Kaeriyama, T. Sakamoto, H. Sunamura, M. Mizuno, H. Kawaura, T. Hasegawa, K. Terabe, T. Nakayama, and M. Aono, "A nonvolatile programmable solid-electrolyte nanometer switch," IEEE J. Solid State Circuits vol. 40, pp.168--176, Jan. 2005.
 
12
 
13
 
14
Xilinx, Inc., Virtex-II Platform FPGA Handbook April 2000.
15
 
16
J. Rose, R. Francis, D. Lewis, and P. Chow, "Architecture of field-programmable gate arrays: the effect of logic block functionality on area efficiency," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1217--1225, 1990.
17
 
18
19
 
20
W. C. Elmore, "The transient analysis of damped linear networks with particular regard to wideband amplifiers," Jour. of Applied Physics vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55--63, 1948.
21
 
22
W. Xu, "VPR for Virtex." Available on: http://www-unix.ecs.umass.edu/~wxu/jbits/VPR_for_Virtex.htm
 
23
S. Yang, "Logic synthesis and optimization benchmarks, version 3.0," tech. rep., Microelectronics Center of North Carolina, 1991.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mingjie Lin: colleagues
Abbas El Gamal: colleagues
Yi-Chang Lu: colleagues
Simon Wong: colleagues