ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A Short Proof that Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction by Maximum Likelihood Is Hard
Full text PdfPdf (93 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB) archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 1  (January 2006) table of contents
Page: 92  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1545-5963
Author
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society Press  Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TCBB.2006.4

ABSTRACT

Maximum likelihood is one of the most widely used techniques to infer evolutionary histories. Although it is thought to be intractable, a proof of its hardness has been lacking. Here, we give a short proof that computing the maximum likelihood tree is NP-hard by exploiting a connection between likelihood and parsimony observed by Tuffley and Steel.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] L. Addario-Berry, B. Chor, M.T. Hallett, J. Lagergren, A. Panconesi, and T. Wareham, "Ancestral Maximum Likelihood of Evolutionary Trees is Hard," J. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 257- 271, 2004.
 
2
 
3
 
4
[4] J. Cavender, "Taxonomy with Confidence," Math. Biosciences, vol. 40, pp. 271-280, 1978.
 
5
[5] B. Chor and T. Tuller, "Maximum Likelihood of Evolutionary Trees is Hard," Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf. Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2005), 2005.
 
6
 
7
[7] W. Day, D. Jonhson, and D. Sankoff, "The Computational Complexity of Inferring Rooted Phylogenies by Parsimony," Math. Biosciences, vol. 81, pp. 33-42, 1986.
 
8
[8] W. Day and D. Sankoff, "The Computational Complexity of Inferring Phylogenies by Compatibility," Systematic Zoology, vol. 35, pp. 224-229, 1986.
 
9
[9] A.W.F. Edwards and L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, "Reconstruction of Evolutionary Trees," Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification, V.H. Heywood and J. McNeill, eds. Systematics Assoc., London, vol. 6, pp. 67-76, 1964.
 
10
[10] J.S. Farris, "A Probability Model for Inferring Evolutionary Trees," Systematic Zoology, vol. 22, pp. 250-256, 1973.
 
11
[11] J. Felsenstein, "Evolutionary Trees from DNA Sequences: A Maximum Likelihood Approach," J. Molecular Evolution, vol. 17, pp. 368-376, 1981.
 
12
[12] J. Felsenstein, Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland: Sinauer Assoc., 2004.
 
13
[13] L. Foulds and R. Graham, "The Steiner Problem in Phylogeny is NP-Complete," Advances in Applied Math., vol. 3, pp. 43-49, 1982.
 
14
 
15
[15] J. Neyman, "Molecular Studies of Evolution: A Source of Novel Statistical Problems," Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics, S.S. Gupta and J. Yackel, eds. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1-27, 1971.
 
16
[16] C. Semple and M. Steel, Phylogenetics. Oxford Univ. Press, 2003.
 
17
[17] C. Tuffley and M. Steel, "Links between Maximum Likelihood and Maximum Parsimony under a Simple Model of Site Substitution," Bull. Math. Biology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 581-607, 1997.
 
18
[18] H.T. Wareham, On the Computational Complexity of Inferring Evolutionary Trees, MSc thesis, Technical Report no. 9301, Dept. of Computer Science, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland 1993.