ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Range-free localization and its impact on large scale sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (1.37 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (November 2005) table of contents
Pages: 877 - 906  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1539-9087
Authors
Tian He  University of Virginia
Chengdu Huang  University of Virginia
Brian M. Blum  University of Virginia
John A. Stankovic  University of Virginia
Tarek F. Abdelzaher  University of Virginia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 146,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1113830.1113837
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

With the proliferation of location dependent applications in sensor networks, location awareness becomes an essential capability of sensor nodes. Because coarse accuracy is sufficient for most sensor network applications, solutions in range-free localization are being pursued as a cost-effective alternative to more expensive range-based approaches. In this paper, we present APIT, a novel localization algorithm that is range-free. We show that our APIT scheme performs best when an irregular radio pattern and random node placement are considered, and low communication overhead is desired. We compare our work, via extensive simulation, with three state-of-the-art range-free localization schemes to identify the preferable system configurations of each. In addition, we provide insight into the impact of localization accuracy on various location dependent applications and suggestions on improving their performance in the presence of such inaccuracy.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bahl, P. and Padmanabhan, V. N. 2000. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM '00.
 
2
Beutel, J. 1999. Geolocation in a picoRadio environment, M.S. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Electronics Laboratory.
 
3
Blum, B., Nagaraddi, P., Wood, A., Abdelzaher, T. F., Son, S., and Stankovic, J. A. 2003. In Proceedings of Mobisys 2003, San Francisco, CA.
 
4
Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2000. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 7, 5, 28--34.
 
5
6
 
7
Caffery, J. Jr. 2000. A new approach to the geometry of TOA location. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), Boston, MA.
 
8
 
9
Crossbow. MICA Sensor Board Information, http://www.xbow.com
 
10
Doherty, L., Ghaoui, L. E., and Pister, K. S. J. 2001. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM '01, Anchorage, AK.
11
 
12
Ganesan, D., Krishnamachari, B., Woo, A., Culler, D., Estrin, D., and Wicker, S. 2002. Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor vetworks. Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR 02-0013.
 
13
Girod, L. and Estrin, D. 2001. Robust range estimation using acoustic and multimodal sensing. In Proceedings of IROS '01, Maui, Hawaii.
14
15
 
16
He, T., Blum, B. M., Stankovic, J. A., and Abdelzaher, T. F. 2003b. A lazy-binding communication protocol for highly dynamic wireless sensor networks. Still in submission.
 
17
 
18
Hightower, J., Boriello, G., and Want, R. 2000. SpotON: An indoor 3D location sensing technology based on RF signal strength. University of Washington CSE Report #2000-02-02.
 
19
Hong, X., Xu, K., and Gerla, M. 2002. Scalable routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Network Magazine, 16, 4.
20
 
21
Kleinrock, L. and Silvester, J. 1978. Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number. In Proceedings of National Telecomm Conference, 4.3.1--4.3.5.
22
23
 
24
Nagpal, R. 1999. Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an amorphous computer. A.I. Memo, MIT A.I. Laboratory.
 
25
Nagpal, R., Shrobe, H., and Bachrach, J. 2003. Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an ad hoc sensor network. In IPSN '03, Palo Alto.
26
 
27
Niculescu, D. and Nath. B. 2001. Ad-hoc positioning systems. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM '01.
 
28
Niculescu, D. and Nath, B. 2003a. DV based positioning in ad hoc networks. Journal of Telecommunication Systems 22, 1, 267--280.
 
29
Niculescu, D. and Nath, B. 2003b. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AoA. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM '03, San Francisco, CA.
30
 
31
32
33
34
 
35
Wellenhoff, B. H., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins, J. 1997. Global Positions System: Theory and Practice, 4th Ed. Springer Verlag, NY.
36
37
38
39


Collaborative Colleagues:
Tian He: colleagues
Chengdu Huang: colleagues
Brian M. Blum: colleagues
John A. Stankovic: colleagues
Tarek F. Abdelzaher: colleagues