ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The quarks of object-oriented development
Full text HtmlHtml (28 KB),  PdfPdf (100 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 49 ,  Issue 2  (February 2006) table of contents
Next-generation cyber forensics
Pages: 123 - 128  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Deborah J. Armstrong  Sam M. Walton College of Business at the University of Arkansas
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 369,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1113034.1113040
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A two-construct taxonomy is used to define the essential elements of object orientation through analysis of existing literature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Byard, C. Object-oriented technology a must for complex systems. Computer Technology Review10, 14 (1990), 15--20.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
Morris, M.G., Speier, C., and Hoffer, J.A. An examination of procedural and object-oriented systems analysis methods: Does prior experience help or hinder performance?" Decision Sciences 30, 1 (Winter 1999), 107--136.
 
7
Page-Jones, M. and Weiss, S. Synthesis: An object-oriented analysis and design method. American Programmer 2, 7--8 (1989), 64--67.
 
8
Robson, D. Object-oriented software systems. Byte 6, 8 (Aug. 1981), 74--86.
 
9
Rosson, M. and Alpert, S.R. The cognitive consequences of object-oriented design. Human Computer Interaction 5, 4 (1990), 345--379.
 
10
11
 
12

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Deborah J. Armstrong: colleagues