Interactive humanoids and androids as ideal interfaces for humans

ABSTRACT

We, humans, anthropomorphize targets of communication. In this sense, humanoids or androids can have ideal interface for humans. This paper focuses on two new fundamental issues in the human interface studies. There are two relationships between robots and humans: one is inter-personal and the other is social. In the inter-personal relationships, the appearance of the robot is a new and important research issues. In the social relationships, a function to recognize human relationships through interaction is needed for robots of the next generation. These two issues explore new possibilities of androids and humanoids. Especially, the appearance problem bridges between science and engineering. The approach from robotics tries to build very humanlike robots based on knowledge from cognitive science. The approach from cognitive science uses the robot for verifying hypotheses for understanding humans. We call this cross-interdisciplinary framework android science.

REFERENCES

• 1: H. Ishiguro, T. Ono, M. Imai, T. Maeda, T. Kanda, R. Nakatsu, Robovie: An interactive humanoid robot, Int. J. Industrial Robotics, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 498--503, Nov. 2001.
• 2: T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, M. Imai, T. Ono, Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 92, No. 11, pp. 1839--1850, Nov. 2004.
• 3: Hiroshi Ishiguro, Toward interactive humanoid robots: a constructive approach to developing intelligent robots, Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 2, p.621-622, July 15-19, 2002, Bologna, Italy [doi>10.1145/544862.544863]
• 4: H. Ishiguro, Android Science, Proc. Int. Symposium Robotics Research, 2005.
• 5: Ken Perlin, Real Time Responsive Animation with Personality, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, v.1 n.1, p.5-15, March 1995 [doi>10.1109/2945.468392]
• 6: A. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, Vol. 59, pp. 433--460, 1950.
• 7: Stevan Harnad, The symbol grounding problem, Physica D, v.42 n.1-3, p.335-346, June 1990
• 8: Stevan Harnad, Other bodies, other minds: a machine incarnation of an old philosophical problem, Minds and Machines, v.1 n.1, p.43-54, Feb. 1991
• 9: M. Mori, Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley), Energy, Vol. 7, pp. 33--35, 1970.
• 10: T. Chaminade and J. Decety, A common framework for perception and action: Neuroimaging evidence, Behavioral & Brain Sciences, Vol. 24, pp. 879--882, 2001.
• 11: S. Itakura, N. Kanaya, M. Shimada, T. Minato, H. Ishiguro, Communicative behavior to the android robot in human infants, Poster paper in Int. Conf. Developmental Learning, 2004.
• 12: A. McCarthy, K. Lee, and D. Muir. Eye gaze displays that index knowing, thinking and guessing, Proc. Annual Conf. American Psychological Society, 2001.
• 13: T. Kanda, T. Hirano, D. Eaton and H. Ishiguro, Person identification and interaction of social robots by using wireless tags, Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1657--1664, 2003.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human information processing

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Verification

Keywords:
android, android science, human interface, humanoid, interactive robot, social robot, sociogram