ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improved lower bounds for embeddings into L1
Full text PdfPdf (216 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm table of contents
Miami, Florida
Pages: 1010 - 1017  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:0-89871-605-5
Authors
Robert Krauthgamer  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose
Yuval Rabani  Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1109557.1109669
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We simplify and improve upon recent lower bounds on the minimum distortion of embedding certain finite metric spaces into l1. In particular, we show that for infinitely many values of n there are n-point metric spaces of negative type that require a distortion of Ω(log log n) for such an embedding, implying the same lower bound on the integrality gap of a well-known SDP relaxation for SPARSEST-CUT. This result builds upon and improves the recent lower bound of (log log n)1/6---o(1) due to Khot and Vishnoi [STOC 2005]. We also show that embedding the edit distance on {O, 1}n into L1 requires a distortion of Ω(log n). This result simplifies and improves a very recent lower bound due to Khot and Naor [FOCS 2005].


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
J. Bourgain. On Lipschitz embedding of finite metric spaces in Hilbert space. Israel J. Math., 52(1-2):46--52, 1985.
 
8
J. Bourgain. On the distributions of the Fourier spectrum of Boolean functions. Israel J. Math., 131:269--276, 2002.
 
9
S. Chawla, A. Gupta, and H. Räcke. Improved approximations to sparsest cut. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 102--111, 2005.
 
10
 
11
M. M. Deza and M. Laurent. Geometry of cuts and metrics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
 
12
E. Friedgut. Boolean functions with low average sensitivity depend on few coordinates. Combinatorica, 18(1):27--35, 1998.
 
13
E. Friedgut and G. Kalai. Every monotone graph property has a sharp threshold. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 124(10):2993--3002, 1996.
 
14
J. Kahn, G. Kalai, and N. Linial. The influence of variables on boolean functions. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 68--80, 1988.
15
 
16
 
17
18
 
19
V. I. Levenshtein. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Dokl., 10:707--710, 1965.
 
20
N. Linial, E. London, and Y. Rabinovich. The geometry of graphs and some of its algorithmic applications. Combinatorica, 15(2):215--245, 1995.
 
21
 
22
S. B. Needleman and C. D. Wunsch. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 48(3):443--453, 1970.
23

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert Krauthgamer: colleagues
Yuval Rabani: colleagues