ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Approximation algorithms for wavelet transform coding of data streams
Full text PdfPdf (379 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm table of contents
Miami, Florida
Pages: 698 - 707  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:0-89871-605-5
Authors
Sudipto Guha  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Boulos Harb  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1109557.1109633
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Given a set of orthonormal basis functions {ψi} and a target function/vector f, the wavelet representation problem is to construct f as a combination of at most B basis vectors to minimize some normed distance between f and f. The problem is well understood if the error is the mean squared error: The largest (ignoring signs) B coefficients of the wavelet expansion should be retained. This strategy follows from the proof of optimality and is not a built-in constraint.The mean squared error, however, is not the optimization criterion in several scenarios. The above easy solution to the wavelet representation problem does not carry over to lp for p ≠ 2, and it turns out that restricting the solution to any subset of coefficients of size B or less is suboptimal compared to the best solution which can choose arbitrary real numbers. Further, all the previous literature on non-l2 errors only considered the Haar system.In this paper we provide the first approximation schemes for the unrestricted optimization problem. We provide a lower bounding technique based on a system of inequalities. We show that a modified greedy algorithm that retains the coefficients of expansion gives a O(log n) true (factor) approximation algorithm for a wide variety of compact wavelet systems, including Haar, Daubechies, Symmlets, Coiflets among others. This vindicates several scaling type algorithms which are used in practice. We subsequently augment the lower bound and give a FPTAS for the Haar system. The same ideas extend to a QPTAS for the more general class of compact wavelets mentioned above. We also consider adaptive quantization problems, which are generalizations of the B-term representations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
R. DeVore. Nonlinear approximation. Acta Numerica, pages 1--99, 1998.
5
6
7
8
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
Y. E. Ioannidis. The history of histograms (abridged). Proc. of VLDB Conference, pages 19--30, 2003.
16
17
 
18
S. Mallat. A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, 1999.
 
19
Y. Matias and D. Urieli. Personal communication, 2004.
 
20
Y. Matias and D. Urieli. Optimal workload-based weighted wavelet synopses. Proc. of ICDT, pages 368--382, 2005.
21
 
22
S. Muthukrishnan. Nonuniform sparse approximation using haar wavelet basis. DIMACS TR 2004-42, 2004.
23

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sudipto Guha: colleagues
Boulos Harb: colleagues