ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Access control management in a distributed environment supporting dynamic collaboration
Full text PdfPdf (261 KB)
Source Workshop On Digital Identity Management archive
Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Digital identity management table of contents
Fairfax, VA, USA
SESSION: DIM frameworks table of contents
Pages: 104 - 112  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-232-1
Authors
Basit Shafiq  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Elisa Bertino  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Arif Ghafoor  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 112,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1102486.1102503
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Ensuring secure and authorized access to remote services and information resources in a dynamic collaborative environment is a challenging task. Two major issues that need to be addressed in this regard are: specification of access control requirements and trust management. Specification of access control requirements for dynamic collaboration is challenging mainly because of the limited or lack of knowledge about remote users' identities and affiliations. The access control policies and constraints defining users' authorization over remote resources and services need to be specified in terms of the attributes and properties of the users. Moreover, the criteria for validating the attributes of the users should also be specified as part of access control requirements. Trust management, in the context of dynamic collaboration, involves validation of user's attributes for secure interaction and prevention of unauthorized disclosure of policies and attributes. The paper discusses these issues in detail and presents a framework for access control and trust management in a distributed collaborative environment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Grandison, T., and Sloman, M. A survey of trust in Internet applications. IEEE Communications Surveys, Fourth Quarter, 2000, 2--14.
4
 
5
Rahman, A.-A. The PGP trust model. The Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1997.
 
6
 
7
Mass, Y., and Shehory, O. Distributed trust in open multi-agent systems. Trust in Cyber Societies, LNAI, R. Falcone, M. Singh, and Y.-H Tan Edition, 2001, 159--173.
 
8
Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., and Domingos, P. Trust management for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference, 2003.
 
9
10
 
11
Winsborough, W., Li, N. Safety in automated trust negotiation, In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004, 147--160.
 
12
Seamons, K.E., Winslett, M., and Yu, T. Limiting the disclosure of access control policies during automated trust negotiation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2002.
 
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
OASIS XML-Based Security Services Technical Committee (SSTC). Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML). Technical Report, http://xml.coverpages.org/saml.html.
 
21
Bhatti, R., Bertino, E., and Ghafoor, A. An integrated approach to federated identity and privilege management in open systems. Accepted for publication in the Communications of the ACM. Also available as CERIAS Technical Report TR 2005-42, https://www.cerias.purdue.edu/tools_and_resources/bibtex_archive/archive/2005-42.pdf.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Basit Shafiq: colleagues
Elisa Bertino: colleagues
Arif Ghafoor: colleagues