ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
"Engineering accessible design": W4A -- international crossdisciplinary workshop on web accessibility 2005 workshop report
Full text PdfPdf (37 KB)
Source ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing archive
Issue 83  (September 2005) table of contents
Pages: 64 - 72  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1558-2337
Authors
Simon Harper  University of Manchester, UK
Yeliz Yesilada  University of Manchester, UK
Carole Goble  University of Manchester, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1102187.1102198
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Previous engineering approaches seem to have precluded the engineering of accessible systems. This is plainly unsatisfactory. Designers, authors, and technologist are at present playing 'catch-up' with a continually moving target in an attempt to retrofit systems. Infact engineering accessible interfaces is as important as their functionality's and should be an indivisible part of the development. We should be engineering accessibility as part of the development and not as afterthought or because government restrictions and civil law requires us to. Our workshop brought together a cross section of the Web design and engineering communities; to report on developments, discuss the issues, and suggest cross-pollinated solutions.Conventional workshops on accessibility tended to be single disciplinary in nature. However, we were concerned that a single disciplinary approach prevents the cross-pollination of ideas, needs, and technologies from other related but separate fields. The workshop was therefore, decidedly cross disciplinary in nature and brought together users, accessibility experts, graphic designers, and technologists from academia and industry to discuss how accessibility could be supported. We also encouraged the participation of users and other interested parties as an additional balance to the discussion. Views often bridged academia, commerce, and industry and arguments encompassed a range of beliefs across the design-accessibility spectrum. Our aim was to focus on accessibility by encouraging participation from many disciplines; represented in the following discussion and paper abstracts.



Collaborative Colleagues:
Simon Harper: colleagues
Yeliz Yesilada: colleagues
Carole Goble: colleagues