ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Proxy re-signatures: new definitions, algorithms, and applications
Full text PdfPdf (225 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Alexandria, VA, USA
SESSION: Cryptography table of contents
Pages: 310 - 319  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-226-7
Authors
Giuseppe Ateniese  Johns Hopkins University
Susan Hohenberger  Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 113,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1102120.1102161
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In 1998, Blaze, Bleumer, and Strauss (BBS) proposed proxy re-signatures, in which a semi-trusted proxy acts as a translator between Alice and Bob. To translate, the proxy converts a signature from Alice into a signature from Bob on the same message. The proxy, however, does not learn any signing key and cannot sign arbitrary messages on behalf of either Alice or Bob. Since the BBS proposal, the proxy re-signature primitive has been largely ignored, but we show that it is a very useful tool for sharing web certificates, forming weak group signatures, and authenticating a network path.We begin our results by formalizing the definition of security for a proxy re-signature. We next substantiate the need for improved schemes by pointing out certain weaknesses of the original BBS proxy re-signature scheme which make it unfit for most practical applications. We then present two secure proxy re-signature schemes based on bilinear maps. Our first scheme relies on the Computational Diffie-Hellman (CDH) assumption; here the proxy can translate from Alice to Bob and vice-versa. Our second scheme relies on the CDH and 2-Discrete Logarithm (2-DL) assumptions and achieves a stronger security guarantee -- the proxy is only able to translate in one direction. Constructing such a scheme has been an open problem since proposed by BBS in 1998. Furthermore in this second scheme, even if the delegator and the proxy collude, they cannot sign on behalf of the delegatee. Both schemes are efficient and secure in the random oracle model.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Giuseppe Ateniese, Kevin Fu, Matthew Green, and Susan Hohenberger. Improved Proxy Re-encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, pages 29--43, 2005.
 
3
Giuseppe Ateniese and Susan Hohenberger. Proxy Re-Signatures: New Definitions, Algorithms, and Applications. Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2005. http://eprint.iacr.org/2005.
 
4
 
5
Matt Blaze, G. Bleumer, and M. Strauss. Divertible protocols and atomic proxy cryptography. In Advances in Cryptology -- EUROCRYPT '98, volume 1403 of LNCS, pages 127--144, 1998.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Dan Boneh, Craig Gentry, Ben Lynn, and Hovav Shacham. Aggregate and verifiably encrypted signatures. In Advances in Cryptology -- EUROCRYPT '03, volume 2656 of LNCS, pages 416--432, 2003.
 
9
 
10
 
11
Jan Camenisch and Anna Lysyanskaya. Signature schemes and anonymous credentials from bilinear maps. In Advances in Cryptology --- CRYPTO 2004, volume 3152 of LNCS, pages 56--72, 2004.
 
12
Yevgeniy Dodis and Anca Ivan. Proxy cryptography revisited. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, February 2003.
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Ari Juels, David Molnar, and David Wagner. Security and privacy issues in e-passports. To appear in IEEE SecureComm, 2005.
 
18
M. Mambo, K. Usuda, and E. Okamoto. Proxy signatures: delegation of the power to sign messages. IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, E79-A(9), 1996.
19
 
20
 
21
K. Ohta and T. Okamoto. Multisignature schemes secure against active insider attacks. IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, E82-A/1:21--31, 1999.
22
 
23
Claus-Peter Schnorr. Efficient signature generation by smart cards. Journal of Cryptography, 4:161--174, 1991.



REVIEW

"Adrian Constantin Atanasiu : Reviewer"

Proxy re-signatures were defined in 1998 by Blase, Bleumer, and Strauss [1]. Here, the proxy acts like a translator between Alice and Bob, by transforming a signature of Alice's into a signature of Bob's. Such a protocol allows Alice to delegate h  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Giuseppe Ateniese: colleagues
Susan Hohenberger: colleagues