| An auctioning reputation system based on anomaly |
| Full text |
Pdf
(278 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Computer and Communications Security
archive
Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
table of contents
Alexandria, VA, USA
SESSION: Security for diffuse computing
table of contents
Pages: 270 - 279
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-226-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Shai Rubin
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
|
|
Mihai Christodorescu
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
|
|
Vinod Ganapathy
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
|
|
Jonathon T. Giffin
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
|
|
Louis Kruger
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
|
|
Hao Wang
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
|
|
Nicholas Kidd
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15, Downloads (12 Months): 88, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Existing reputation systems used by online auction houses do not address the concern of a buyer shopping for commodities - finding a good bargain. These systems do not provide information on the practices adopted by sellers to ensure profitable auctions. These practices may be legitimate, like imposing a minimum starting bid on an auction, or fraudulent, like using colluding bidders to inflate the final price in a practice known as shilling.We develop a reputation system to help buyers identify sellers whose auctions seem price-inflated. Our reputation system is based upon models that characterize sellers according to statistical metrics related to price inflation. We combine the statistical models with anomaly detection techniques to identify the set of suspicious sellers. The output of our reputation system is a set of values for each seller representing the confidence with which the system can say that the auctions of the seller are price-inflated.We evaluate our reputation system on 604 high-volume sellers who posted 37,525 auctions on eBay. Our system automatically pinpoints sellers whose auctions contain potential shill bidders. When we manually analyze these sellers' auctions, we find that many winning bids are at about the items' market values, thus undercutting a buyer's ability to find a bargain and demonstrating the effectiveness of our reputation system.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
P. Bajari and A. Hortaçsu. The winner's curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2):329--355, Summer 2003.
|
| |
2
|
R. J. Bolton and D. J. Hand. Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3):235--255, 2002.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
U. Brinkmann and M. Seifert. `Face to Interface': Zum Problem der Vertrauenskonstitution im Internet am Beispiel von elektronischen Auktionen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 30(1):23--47, Feb. 2001.
|
| |
5
|
P. Chaudhuri and W.-Y. Loh. Nonparametric estimation of conditional quantiles using quantile regression trees. Bernoulli, 8:561--576, 2002.
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
S. Dewan and V. Hsu. Trust in electronic markets: Price discovery in generalist versus specialty online auctions. Working paper, available a http://databases.si.umich.edu/reputations/bib/papers/Dewan&Hsu.doc, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
eBay Inc. Policy: Seller shill bidding. Published online at http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/seller-shill-bidding. html (last accessed May 4, 2005).
|
| |
12
|
eBay Inc. First quarter 2005 financial results, April 2005.
|
| |
13
|
Z. Hidvégi, W. Wang, and A. B. Whinston. Shill-proof fee (SPF) schedule: the sunscreen against seller self-collusion in online English auctions. Working paper, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
|
| |
14
|
D. Houser and J. Wooders. Reputation in auctions: Theory, and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2004.
|
| |
15
|
J. H. Kagel and D. Levin. Common Value Auctions and the Winner's Curse. Princeton University Press, 2002.
|
 |
16
|
Robert J. Kauffman , Charles A. Wood, Running up the bid: detecting, predicting, and preventing reserve price shilling in online auctions, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic commerce, p.259-265, September 30-October 03, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
[doi> 10.1145/948005.948040]
|
| |
17
|
R. Koenker and G. Bassett. Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46:33--50, 1978.
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
W. Lee, S. J. Stolfo, and K. W. Mok. A data mining framework for building intrusion detection models. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 120--132, Oakland, CA, 1999.
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
New York Attorney General. Shill bidding exposed in online auctions. Press release, Nov. 2004.
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
P. Resnick and R. Zeckhauser. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. In M. R. Baye, editor, The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce, volume 11 of Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2002.
|
| |
25
|
P. Resnick, R. Zeckhauser, J. Swanson, and K. Lockwood. The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Working paper, available at http://www.si.umich.edu/~presnick/papers/postcards/, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
|
| |
26
|
J. A. Rice. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Duxbury Press, 2nd edition, 1994.
|
| |
27
|
H. S. Shah, N. R. Joshi, A. Sureka, and P. R. Wurman. Mining eBay: Bidding strategies and shill detection. In Springer-Verlag, editor, 4th International Workshop on Mining Web Data for Discovering Usage Patterns and Profiles, Edmonton, Alberta, July 2003.
|
|