ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Modeling insider attacks on group key-exchange protocols
Full text PdfPdf (230 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Alexandria, VA, USA
SESSION: Key management, key exchange, & pseudo-random generation table of contents
Pages: 180 - 189  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-226-7
Authors
Jonathan Katz  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Ji Sun Shin  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 101,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1102120.1102146
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Protocols for authenticated key exchange (AKE) allow parties within an insecure network to establish a common session key which can then be used to secure their future communication. It is fair to say that group AKE is currently less well understood than the case of two-party AKE; in particular, attacks by malicious insiders --- a concern specific to the group setting --- have so far been considered only in a relatively "ad-hoc" fashion. The main contribution of this work is to address this deficiency by providing a formal, comprehensive model and definition of security for group AKE which automatically encompasses insider attacks. We do so by defining an appropriate ideal functionality for group AKE within the universal composability (UC) framework. As a side benefit, any protocol secure with respect to our definition is secure even when run concurrently with other protocols, and the key generated by any such protocol may be used securely in any subsequent application.In addition to proposing this definition, we show that the resulting notion of security is strictly stronger than the one proposed by Bresson, et al. (termed "AKE-security"), and that our definition implies all previously-suggested notions of security against insider attacks. We also show a simple technique for converting any AKE-secure protocol into one secure with respect to our definition.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Y. Amir, Y. Kim, C. Nita-Rotaru, J. Schultz, J. Stanton, and G. Tsudik. Exploring Robustness in Group Key Agreement. ICDCS 2001.
 
2
3
4
 
5
M. Bellare, D. Pointcheval, and P. Rogaway. Authenticated Key Exchange Secure Against Dictionary Attacks. Eurocrypt 2000.
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
R. Canetti and T. Rabin. Universal Composition with Joint State. Crypto 2003.
 
16
Z. Cheng, L. Vasiu, and R. Comley. Pairing-Based One-Round Tripartite Key Agreement Protocols. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/079.
 
17
H.-Y. Chien. Comments: Insider Attack on Cheng et al.'s Pairing-Based Tripartite Key Agreement Protocols. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2005/013.
 
18
W. Diffie and M. Hellman. New Directions in Cryptography. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory 22(6): 644--654 (1976).
 
19
 
20
X. Du, Y. Wang, J. Ge, and Y. Wang. An Improved ID-Based Authenticated Group Key Agreement Scheme. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/260.
 
21
M. Fischlin. Pseudorandom Function Tribe Ensembles Based on One-Way Permutations: Improvements and Applications. Eurocrypt '99.
22
 
23
J. Katz and M. Yung. Scalable Protocols for Authenticated Group Key Exchange. Crypto 2003. Full version available at http://www.cs.umd.edu/~jkatz/papers.html.
 
24
 
25
B. Pfitzmann, M. Steiner, and M. Waidner. A Formal Model for Multi-Party Group Key Agreement. Technical Report RZ-3383 (#93419), IBM Research.
 
26
 
27
 
28
K. Shim. Cryptanalysis of Al-Riyami-Paterson's Authenticated Three Party Key Agreement Protocols. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/122.
 
29
V. Shoup. On Formal Models for Secure Key Exchange. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/1999/012.
 
30
M. Steiner. Secure Group Key Agreement. PhD Thesis, Universitat des Saarlandes, 2002. Available at http://www.semper.org/sirene/publ/Stei_02.thesis-final.pdf.
 
31
H.-M. Sun and B.-T. Hsieh. Security Analysis of Shim's Authenticated Key Agreement Protocols from Pairings. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/113.
 
32
Q. Tang and C.J. Mitchell. Rethinking the Security of Some Authenticated Group Key Agreement Schemes. Available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/348.
 
33

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jonathan Katz: colleagues
Ji Sun Shin: colleagues