ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Probabilistic web image gathering
Full text PdfPdf (923 KB)
Source International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGMM international workshop on Multimedia information retrieval table of contents
Hilton, Singapore
SESSION: Oral session 2: web searching and applications table of contents
Pages: 57 - 64  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-244-5
Authors
Keiji Yanai  The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan
Kobus Barnard  University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101826.1101838
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We propose a new method for automated large scale gathering of Web images relevant to specified concepts. Our main goal is to build a knowledge base associated with as many concepts as possible for large scale object recognition studies. A second goal is supporting the building of more accurate text-based indexes for Web images. In our method, good quality candidate sets of images for each keyword are gathered as a function of analysis of the surrounding HTML text. The gathered images are then segmented into regions, and a model for the probability distribution of regions for the concept is computed using an iterative algorithm based on the previous work on statistical image annotation. The learned model is then applied to identify which images are visually relevant to the concept implied by the keyword. Implicitly, which regions or the images are relevant is also determined. Our experiments reveal that the new method performs much better than Google Image Search and a simple method based on more standard content based image retrieval methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391--407, 1990.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In Proc. of IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 264--271, 2003.
 
8
R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. A visual category filter for google images. In Proc. of European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 242--255, 2004.
 
9
 
10
 
11
M. R. Naphade, S. Basu, J. R. Smith, C. Y. Lin, and B. Tseng. Modeling semantic concepts to support query by keywords in video. In Proc. of IEEE Intl. Conference on Image Processing, pages I--145--148, 2002.
 
12
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
K. Yanai. Image collector: An image-gathering system from the World-Wide Web employing keyword-based search engines. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pages 704--707, 2001.
17

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Keiji Yanai: colleagues
Kobus Barnard: colleagues