ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sonification design and metaphors: Comments on Walker and Kramer, ICAD 1996
Full text PdfPdf (65 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 4  (October 2005) table of contents
Pages: 413 - 417  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1544-3558
Authors
Bruce N. Walker  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Gregory Kramer  ICAD/Metta Foundation, Portland, OR
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 100,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101530.1101535
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The original Walker and Kramer paper at ICAD 1996 studied the mapping of data dimensions (e.g., temperature) onto sound dimensions (e.g., pitch). In this commentary we consider the historical and methodological context of that early work, discuss its relevance to the field of auditory display, and point out how it forms part of a body of work with ties to other researchers in the ICAD community.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, J. and Sanderson, P. 2004. Designing sonifications for effective attentional control in complex work domains. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES2004), New Orleans, LA. 1818--1822.
 
2
 
3
Bonebright, T. L., Nees, M. A., Connerley, T. T., and Mccain, G. R. 2001. Testing the effectiveness of sonified graphs for education: A programmatic research project. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2001). Espoo, Finland. 62--66.
 
4
Edworthy, J., Hellier, E. J., and Hards, R. 1995. The semantic associations of acoustic parameters commonly used in the design of auditory information and warning signals. Ergonomics 38, 11, 2341--2361.
 
5
Flowers, J. H., Buhman, D. C., and Turnage, K. D. 1997. Cross-modal equivalence of visual and auditory scatterplots for exploring bivariate data samples. Human Factors 39, 3, 341--351.
 
6
Flowers, J. H. and Hauer, T. A. 1995. Musical versus visual graphs: Cross-modal equivalence in perception of time series data. Human Factors 37, 3, 553--569.
 
7
Hellier, E., Edworthy, J., and Dennis, I. 1993. Improving auditory warning design: Quantifying and predicting the effects of different warning parameters on perceived urgency. Human Factors 35, 693--706.
 
8
Hellier, E., Edworthy, J., Weedon, B., Walters, K., and Adams, A. 2002. The perceived urgency of speech warnings: Semantics versus acoustics. Human Factors 44, 1, 1--17.
 
9
Kramer, G. 1994a. Some organizing principles for representing data with sound. In Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces. G. Kramer, Ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 185--222.
 
10
 
11
Kramer, G. 2004. Auditory display as an aid to understanding and empowering human function: Invited Keynote Address at ICAD2004 Sonif(y) Festival. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2004), Sydney, Australia.
 
12
Neuhoff, J. G. 1998. Dynamic intensity change influences perceived pitch: Attentional differences between musicians and non-musicians. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and 135th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. 2359--2360.
 
13
Neuhoff, J. G., Ed. 2004. Ecological Psychoacoustics. Academic Press, New York.
 
14
Neuhoff, J. G., Kramer, G., and Wayand, J. 2002. Pitch and loudness interact in auditory displays: Can the data get lost in the map? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8, 1, 17--25.
 
15
Neuhoff, J. G. and Mcbeath, M. K. 1996. The Doppler Illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22, 970--985.
 
16
Siebebaler, L. M. 2003. Magnitude Estimation of Sound Attributes Used in Auditory Displays: A Study of Blind and Visually Impaired Listeners. Unpublished Senior Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
 
17
Smith, D. R. and Walker, B. N. 2002. Tick-marks, axes, and labels: The effects of adding context to auditory graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2002). Kyoto, Japan. 362--367.
 
18
Smith, D. R. and Walker, B. N. 2004. Effects of training and auditory context on performance of a point estimation sonification task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (HFES2004). New Orleans, LA. 1828--1831.
 
19
Smith, D. R. and Walker, B. N. in press. Effects of auditory context cues and training on performance of a point estimation sonification task. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
 
20
Walker, B. N. 2002. Magnitude estimation of conceptual data dimensions for use in sonification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8, 4, 211--221.
 
21
Walker, B. N. 2005. Consistency of magnitude estimations with conceptual data dimensions used for sonification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
 
22
Walker, B. N. and Ehrenstein, A. 1997. Congruency effects with dynamic auditory stimuli: Design implications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD1997). Palo Alto, CA. 7--12.
 
23
Walker, B. N. and Ehrenstein, A. 2000. Pitch and pitch change interact in auditory displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6, 15--30.
 
24
Walker, B. N. and Kramer, G. 1996. Mappings and metaphors in auditory displays: An experimental assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD1996). Palo Alto, CA. 71--74.
 
25
Walker, B. N. and Kramer, G. 2004. Ecological psychoacoustics and auditory displays: Hearing, grouping, and meaning making. In Ecological Psychoacoustics. J. G. Neuhoff, Ed. Academic Press, New York. 150--175.
 
26
Walker, B. N., Kramer, G., and Lane, D. M. 2000. Psychophysical scaling of sonification mappings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2000). Atlanta, GA. 99--102.
 
27
Walker, B. N. and Lane, D. M. 2001. Psychophysical scaling of sonification mappings: A comparison of visually impaired and sighted listeners. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2001). Espoo, Finland. 90--94.
 
28
Walker, B. N. and Mauney, L. M. 2004. Individual differences, cognitive abilities, and the interpretation of auditory graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2004). Sydney, Australia.
 
29
Walker, B. N. and Nees, M. A. 2005. Brief training for performance of a point estimation sonification task. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2005). Limerick, Ireland.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bruce N. Walker: colleagues
Gregory Kramer: colleagues