ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
PLASMA: a PLAnetary scale monitoring architecture
Full text PdfPdf (1.25 MB)
Source International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia table of contents
Hilton, Singapore
SESSION: Brave new topics 1: multimedia challenges for planetary scale applications table of contents
Pages: 96 - 102  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-044-2
Author
Demet Aksoy  University of California, Davis, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1101149.1101164
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While sensor networks continue to attract significant interest in various research communities, high impact applications still have a long list of challenges to be addressed. An individual sensor system can provide important observations within a local area. However, local observations alone are not sufficient for some applications that require planetary scale coverage. Monitoring volcanic activity, nuclear disasters, magnetic field changes, migration patterns of species, pandemic disease spread patterns are some examples to such applications. These applications require a close interaction between different sensor networks with in-situ and remotely sensed observations. In this paper we describe our PLASMA (PLAnetary Scale Monitoring Architecture) project to motivate the challenges that need to be addressed at such scale. These include approximations in spatiotemporal attributes due to resource constraints and also multi-attribute visualization to enable a real-time user interface to the system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Akkaya, M. Younis, "A Survey of Routing Protocols in Sensor Networks, the Elsevier Journal of Ad-Hoc Networks, Vol. 3/3, pp. 325--349, 2005.
 
2
D. Aksoy, A. Aksoy. "Satellite-Linked Sensor Networks for Planetary Scale Monitoring". In Proc. of IEEE VTC, Los Angeles, CA, Sept. 2004.
 
3
D. Aksoy, M.S. Leung. Pull vs Push: A Quantitative Comparison for Data Broadcast. In Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM, Dallas, TX, Dec. 2004.
 
4
I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, "A Survey on Sensor Networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, August 2002, pp.102--114.
 
5
H. Lim, and J.C. Hou, "Localization for Anisotropic Sensor Networks", IEEE Infocom, March 13-17, 2005.
 
6
Jankun-Kelly, T. J. and Ma, K.-L., "MorieGraphs: Radial Focus+Context Visualization and Interaction for Graphs with Visual Nodes", Proceedings of the Information Visualization Symposium, 2003
 
7
D. Niculescu and B. Nath, "Ad Hoc Positioning System (APS)," IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, volume 5, November 2001, pp.2926--2931.
8
 
9
H. Stadler and P. Skritek. "Remote Water Quality Monitoring On-Line Using LEO Satellites. "Water Science and Technology, 47(2): 197--204, 2003.
 
10
R. Stoleru, J. A. Stankovic, "Probability Grid: A Location Estimation Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks," In Proceedings of SECON 2004.
11
 
12
A. Ward, A. Jones, A. Hopper, "A New Location Technique for the Active Office," IEEE Personal Communications, volume 4, no. 5, October 1997, pp.42--47.
13