ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
QED: a novel quaternary encoding to completely avoid re-labeling in XML updates
Full text PdfPdf (281 KB)
Source Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Bremen, Germany
SESSION: Paper session DB-5 (databases): updates and change detection table of contents
Pages: 501 - 508  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-140-6
Authors
Changqing Li  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Tok Wang Ling  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099554.1099692
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The method of assigning labels to the nodes of the XML tree is called a labeling scheme. Based on the labels only, both ordered and un-ordered queries can be processed without accessing the original XML file. One more important point for the labeling scheme is the label update cost in inserting or deleting a node into or from the XML tree. All the current labeling schemes have high update cost, therefore in this paper we propose a novel quaternary encoding approach for the labeling schemes. Based on this encoding approach, we need not re-label any existing nodes when the update is performed. Extensive experimental results on the XML datasets illustrate that our QED works much better than the existing labeling schemes on the label updates when considering either the number of nodes or the time for re-labeling.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
T. Amagasa, M. Yoshikawa, and S. Uemura. QRS: A Robust Numbering Scheme for XML Documents. In Proc. of ICDE, pages 705--707, 2003.
 
4
J.A. Anderson and J.M. Bell. Number Theory with Application. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1997.
 
5
A. Berglund, S. Boag, D. Chamberlin, M. F. Fernandez, M. Kay, J. Robie, and J. Simon. XML path language (XPath) 2.0. W3C working draft 04, Apr 2005.
 
6
S. Boag, D. Chamberlin, M. F. Fernandez, D. Florescu, J. Robie, and J. Simon. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language. W3C working draft 04, Apr 2005.
 
7
T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, E. Maler, and F. Yergeau. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 third edition W3C recommendation. Oct. 2000.
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
C. Li and T.W. Ling. An Improved Prefix Labeling Scheme: A Binary String Approach for Dynamic Ordered XML. In Proc. of DASFAA, pages 125--137, 2005.
12
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
NIAGARA Experimental Data. Available at: http://www.cs.wisc.edu/niagara/data.html
17
 
18
19
 
20
University of Washington XML Repository. Available at: http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/xmldatasets/
 
21
 
22
XMark -- An XML Benchmark Project. Available at: http://monetdb.cwi.nl/xml/downloads.html
 
23
F. Yergeau. UTF8: A Transformation Format of ISO 10646. Request for Comments (RFC) 2279, January 1998.
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Changqing Li: colleagues
Tok Wang Ling: colleagues