Gauging adoptability: a case study of e-portfolio template development

ABSTRACT

To help improve the decision-making process involved in planning for deployment of new centrally-supported internet technologies, the project described in this paper proposes a solution that makes use of web survey technology combined with some established research on users' technology adoption processes. Increasingly, academic computing service groups find themselves trying to decide when and how quickly to deploy new online services. As new forms of commercial and open source web-based applications become available at a quickening pace, for instance, questions arise as to whether a significant number of local users would actually use them. Moreover, the widespread use of XML and stylesheets as underlying presentation technologies in these web applications present academic support groups with even more deployment decisions, such as whether or not to invest time and resources in refining a particular web application's user interface. As described in this paper, these kinds of challenges can sometimes be met in a fairly easy and affordable way by drawing upon 1) recent developments in web survey technology along with 2) any of several models and constructs developed over the past two decades to help predict users' technology choices. Specifically, this paper describes a work-in-progress to develop an approach towards combining web survey systems together with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), in order to anticipate the usability and usefulness ratings among several candidate iterations of e-Portfolio templates under consideration for deployment in one university setting.

REFERENCES

• 1: Lisa Ann Petrides, Case studies on information technology in higher education: implications for policy and practice, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2000
• 2: Jared Spool , Will Schroeder, Testing web sites: five users is nowhere near enough, CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, March 31-April 05, 2001, Seattle, Washington [doi>10.1145/634067.634236]
• 3: Michael G. Morris , Andrew Dillon, How User Perceptions Influence Software Use, IEEE Software, v.14 n.4, p.58-65, July 1997 [doi>10.1109/52.595956]
• 4: Schwartz, H. J. and Bridwell-Bowles, L.S. A selected bibliography on computers in composition: An update. College Composition and Communication 38:4, 1987.
• 5: Jafari, A. The "Sticky" ePortfolio System: Tackling Challenges and Identifying Attributes. EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 39, no. 4 (July/August 2004): 38--49.
• 6: Davis, F.D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology." MIS Quarterly 13(3), 1989
• 7: Fred D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.38 n.3, p.475-487, March 1993 [doi>10.1006/imms.1993.1022]
• 8: Viswanath Venkatesh , Fred D. Davis, A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, v.46 n.2, p.186-204, February 2000 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926]
• 9: Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 1993, 517--525.
• 10: Yogesh Malhotra , Dennis F. Galletta, Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 1, p.1006, January 05-08, 1999
• 11: Yrjö Engeström , Virginia Escalante, Mundane tool or object of affection?: the rise and fall of the Postal Buddy, Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1995

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.1 Project and People Management
          Subjects: Systems analysis and design

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
technology acceptance model, usability evaluation, web-based surveys