Design and deployment of industrial sensor networks: experiences from a semiconductor plant and the north sea

ABSTRACT

Sensing technology is a cornerstone for many industrial applications. Manufacturing plants and engineering facilities, such as shipboard engine rooms, require sensors to ensure product quality and efficient and safe operation. We focus on one representative application, preventative equipment maintenance, in which vibration signatures are gathered to predict equipment failure. Based on application requirements and site surveys, we develop a general architecture for this class of industrial applications. This architecture meets the application's data fidelity needs through careful state preservation and over-sampling. We describe the impact of implementing the architecture on two sensing platforms with differing processor and communication capabilities. We present a systematic performance comparison between these platforms in the context of the application. We also describe our experience and lessons learned in two settings: in a semiconductor fabrication plant and onboard an oil tanker in the North Sea. Finally, we establish design guidelines for an ideal platform and architecture for industrial applications. This paper includes several unique contributions: a study of the impact of platform on architecture, a comparison of two deployments in the same application class, and a demonstration of application return on investment.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bilstrup, U. and Wiberg, P.-A. Bluetooth in industrial environment. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, (WFCS 2000) (Portugal, September 2000).
• 2: Alberto Cerpa , Jeremy Elson , Michael Hamilton , Jerry Zhao , Deborah Estrin , Lewis Girod, Habitat monitoring: application driver for wireless communications technology, Workshop on Data communication in Latin America and the Caribbean, p.20-41, April 2001, San Jose, Costa Rica [doi>10.1145/371626.371720]
• 3: Crossbow, Inc., MICA2 mote, http://www.xbow.com/Products/productsdetails.aspx?sid=72
• 4: Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Heidemann, J. and Kumar, S. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networks (MobiCOM '99) (Seattle, WA, August 1999).
• 5: Kjesbu, S. and Brunsvik, T. Radiowave propagation in industrial environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (IECON 2000) (Nagoya, Japan, October 2000).
• 6: Lymberopoulos, D., Hseush, J., Mascia, J., Tully, S., Barton-Sweeny, A., Lindsey, Q., Kelly, M., and Savvides, A. Light-based localization and XYZ node architecture. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2005) (Los Angeles, CA, April 2005).
• 7: Nachman, L., Kling, R., Adler, R., Huang, J., and Hummel, V. The Intel mote platform: a bluetooth-based sensor network for industrial monitoring. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2005) (Los Angeles, CA, April 2005).
• 8: Olney, D. Vibration monitoring with wireless networks. http://www.qualitymag.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Item/0,6425,98976,00.html
• 9: Paek, J., Caffrey, K.C., Govindan, and R., Masri, S. A wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: performance and experience. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNetS-II) (Sydney, Australia, May 2005).
• 10: Ramanathan, N., Yarvis, M., Chhabra, J., Kushalnagar, N., Krishnamurthy, L., and Estrin, D. A stream-oriented power management protocol for low duty cycle sensor network applications. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNetS-II) (Sydney, Australia, May 2005).
• 11: Rappaport, T. Indoor radio communications for factories of the future, IEEE Communications Magazine, 27, 5, (May 1989), 15--24.
• 12: Rappaport, T. Characterization of UHF multipath radio channels in factory buildings. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 37 (Aug. 1989) 1058--1069.
• 13: Rappaport, T. and McGillem, C. UHF fading in factories. IEEE JSAC, 7, 1 (Jan 1989), 40--48.
• 14: Pei Zhang , Christopher M. Sadler , Stephen A. Lyon , Margaret Martonosi, Hardware design experiences in ZebraNet, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA [doi>10.1145/1031495.1031522]
• 15: Sensicast Press Release. http://www.sensicast.com/news_events/news_events-detail.081004.php
• 16: Sensor Network Magazine. Condition based monitoring, http://www.sensorsmag.com/articles/0602/14/main.shtml
• 17: Staub, O., Zurcher, J.-F., Morel, P., and Croisier, A. Indoor propagation and electromagnetic pollution in an industrial plant. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (IECON) (New Orleans, LA, Nov. 1997).
• 18: Robert Szewczyk , Alan Mainwaring , Joseph Polastre , John Anderson , David Culler, An analysis of a large scale habitat monitoring application, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA [doi>10.1145/1031495.1031521]
• 19: Tiwari, A., Lewis, F.L., and Ge, S.S. Wireless sensor networks for machine condition based monitoring. In Proeedings of the. Int. Conf. Control, Automation, Robotics, and Vision (Kunming, China, Dec 2004).
• 20: Wan, C.-Y., Campbell, A.T., and Krishnamurthy, L. Pump-slowly, fetch-quickly (PSFQ): a reliable transport protocol for sensor networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23, 4, (April 2005) 862--872.
• 21: Ning Xu , Sumit Rangwala , Krishna Kant Chintalapudi , Deepak Ganesan , Alan Broad , Ramesh Govindan , Deborah Estrin, A wireless sensor network For structural monitoring, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA [doi>10.1145/1031495.1031498]
• 22: Yarvis, M.D., Conner, W.S., Krishnamurthy, L., Chhabra, J., Elliott, B., and Mainwaring, A. Real-world experiences with an interactive ad hoc sensor network. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ad Hoc Networking (IWAHN 2002) (Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 2002), 143--151.
• 23: Yarvis, M., Kushalnagar, N., Singh, H., Rangarajan, A., Liu, Y., and Singh, S. Exploiting heterogeneity in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communiation (INFOCOM 2005) (Miami, FL, March 2005).
• 24: Zeevo, Inc, TC2001P Product Brief, http://www.zeevo.com/pdf_files/TC2001P_HCI_prodbrief_v1.2.pdf

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.3 SPECIAL-PURPOSE AND APPLICATION-BASED SYSTEMS
      Subjects: Real-time and embedded systems

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.3 SPECIAL-PURPOSE AND APPLICATION-BASED SYSTEMS
      Subjects: Signal processing systems; Microprocessor/microcomputer applications

General Terms:
Design, Economics, Experimentation, Performance

Keywords:
embedded hardware design, industrial applications of sensor networks