|
ABSTRACT
Many spatiotemporal applications store moving object data in the form of trajectories. Various recent works have addressed interesting queries on trajectorial data, mainly focusing on range queries and Nearest Neighbor queries. Here we examine another interesting query, the Time Relaxed Spatiotemporal Trajectory Join (TRSTJ) which effectively finds groups of moving objects that have followed similar movements in different times. We first attempt to address the TRSTJ problem using a symbolic representation algorithm, which we have recently proposed for trajectory joins. However we show experimentally that this solution produces false positives that grow rapidly with the increase of the problem size. As a result, it is inefficient for TRSTJ queries as it leads to large query time overhead. In order to improve query performance, we propose two important heuristics that turn the symbolic represenation approach effective for TRSTJ queries. Our first improvement, allows the use of multiple origins when processing strings representing trajectories. The experimental evaluation shows that the multiple-origin approach drastically reduces query performance. We then present a ``divide and conquer'' approach to further reduce false positives through symbolic class separation. The proposed solutions can be combined together, which leads to even better query performance. We present an experimental study revealing the advantages of using these approaches for solving Time Relaxed Spatiotemporal Trajectory Join queries.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Spatio-temporal Generators, http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~marioh/generators/index.html
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
Thomas Brinkhoff , Hans-Peter Kriegel , Bernhard Seeger, Efficient processing of spatial joins using R-trees, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.237-246, May 25-28, 1993, Washington, D.C., United States
|
| |
5
|
V. P. Chakka, A. Everspaugh, J. M. Patel. Indexing Large Trajectory Data Sets With SETI. In Proc. of Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), 2003.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
Ralf Hartmut Güting , Michael H. Böhlen , Martin Erwig , Christian S. Jensen , Nikos A. Lorentzos , Markus Schneider , Michalis Vazirgiannis, A foundation for representing and querying moving objects, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.25 n.1, p.1-42, March 2000
[doi> 10.1145/352958.352963]
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
Jessica Lin , Eamonn Keogh , Stefano Lonardi , Bill Chiu, A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms, Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGMOD workshop on Research issues in data mining and knowledge discovery, June 13-13, 2003, San Diego, California
[doi> 10.1145/882082.882086]
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
M. Nascimento, J. Silva. In Proc. of ACM Symp. on Applied Computing (SAC), 1998.
|
| |
17
|
D. Papadias, Y. Tao, J. Zhang, N. Mamoulis, Q. Shen, J. Sun. Indexing and Retrieval of Historical Aggregate Information about Moving Objects. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 25(2), June 2002.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
P. Rigaux, M. Scholl, A. Voisard. Spatial Databases With Application to GIS. Morgan Kaufman, 2001.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
J. Shan, D. Zhang, B. Salzberg. On Spatial-Range Closest-Pair Query. In Proc. of Symposium on Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases (SSTD), pages 252--269, 2003.
|
| |
22
|
S. Shekhar, S. Chawla. Spatial Databases: A Tour. Prentice Hall, 2003.
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
CITED BY 3
|
|
|
|
|
Goce Trajcevski , Hui Ding , Peter Scheuermann , Roberto Tamassia , Dennis Vaccaro, Dynamics-aware similarity of moving objects trajectories, Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, November 07-09, 2007, Seattle, Washington
|
|
|
|
|