ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Monitoring dynamic spatial fields using responsive geosensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (408 KB)
Source Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems table of contents
Bremen, Germany
SESSION: Sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 51 - 60  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-146-5
Authors
Matt Duckham  University of Melbourne, Australia
Silvia Nittel  University of Maine, Orono, ME
Mike Worboys  University of Maine, Orono, ME
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1097064.1097073
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information about dynamic spatial fields, such as temperature, windspeed, or the concentration of gas pollutant in the air, is important for many environmental applications. At the same time, the development of geosensor networks (wirelessly communicating, sensor-enabled, small computing devices distributed throughout a geographic environment) present new opportunities for monitoring dynamic spatial fields in much greater detail than ever before. This paper develops a new model for querying information about dynamic spatial fields using geosensor networks. In order to manage the inherent complexity of dynamic geographic phenomena, our approach is to focus on the qualitative representation of spatial entities, like regions, boundaries, and holes, and of events, like splitting, merging, appearance, and disappearance. Based on combinatorial maps, we present a qualitative model as the underlying data management paradigm for geosensor networks. This model is capable of tracking salient changes in the network in an energy-efficient way. Further, our model enables reconfiguration of the geosensor network in response to changes in the environment. We present an algorithm capable of adapting sensor network granularity according to dynamic monitoring requirements. Regions of high variability can trigger increases in the geosensor network granularity, leading to more detailed information about the dynamic field. Conversely, regions of stability can trigger a coarsening of the sensor network, leading to efficiency increases in particular with respect to power consumption and longevity of the sensor nodes. Querying of this responsive geosensor network is also considered, and the paper concludes with a review of future research directions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Ahmad and S. P. Simonovic. Spatial system dynamics: New approach for simulation of water resources systems. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18(4):331--340, 2004.
2
 
3
J. C. Chen, J. Yip, L.and Elson, H. Wang, D. Maniezzo, R. E. Hudson, K. Yao, and D. Estrin. Coherent acoustic array processing and localization on wireless sensor network. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(8), 2003.
 
4
 
5
J.R. Edmonds. A combinatorial representation for polyhedral surfaces. Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 7:646, 1960.
 
6
A. Galton. Qualitative Spatial Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2000.
 
7
A. Galton. Fields and objects in space, time, and space-time. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2004. forthcoming.
 
8
P. Grenon and B. Smith. SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4(1):69--104, 2004.
9
 
10
J. Hellerstein, W. Hong, S. Madden, and k Stanek. Beyond average: Towards sophisticated sensing with queries. In IPSN'03, 2003.
 
11
C. Jensen. Database aspects of location-based services. In J. Schiller and A.~Voisard, editors, Location-Based Services, chapter~5, pages 115--147. Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
 
12
J. G. Kroes, J. G. Wesseling, and J. C. Van Dam. Integrated modelling of the soil-water-atmosphere-plant system using the model SWAP 2.0: An overview of theory and an application. Hydrological Processes, 14(11--12):1993--2002, 2000.
 
13
D. Livingstone, J. Raper, and T. McCarthy. Integrating aerial videography and digital photography with terrain modelling: An application for coastal geomorphology. Geomorphology, 29(1--2):77--92, 1999.
 
14
R. L. Moses, D. Krishnamurthy, and R. M. Patterson. A self-localization method forwireless sensor networks. EURASIPJournal on Applied Signal Processing, 4:348--358, 2002.
 
15
M. A. Mostafavi and C. Gold. A global kinetic spatial data structure for marine simulation. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 18(3), 2004.
 
16
 
17
R. Muetzelfeldt and M. Duckham. Dynamic spatial modeling in the Similie visual modeling environment. In P. F. Fisher and D. J. Unwin, editors, Re-presenting GIS, chapter~17, pages 244--256. John Wiley, 2005.
 
18
S. Nittel, M. Duckham, and L. Kulik. Information dissemination in mobile ad-hoc geosensor networks. In M.J. Egenhofer, C.~Freksa, and H.J. Miller, editors, GIScience 2004, volume 3234 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 206--222. Springer, Berlin, 2004.
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
J. Raper and D. Livingstone. Development of a geomorphological spatial model using object-oriented design. International Journal of Geographic information Systems, 9(4):359--184, 1995.
23
24
 
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
Matt Duckham: colleagues
Silvia Nittel: colleagues
Mike Worboys: colleagues