ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
MANET simulation studies: the incredibles
Full text PdfPdf (967 KB)
Source ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review archive
Volume 9 ,  Issue 4  (October 2005) table of contents
Special Issue on Medium Access and Call Admission Control Algorithms for Next Generation Wireless Networks.

The Digital Library version of this issue has a corrected special issue title compared to the one in the print version of the issue.

SESSION: Papers from MC2R open call table of contents
Pages: 50 - 61  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1559-1662
Authors
Stuart Kurkowski  Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
Tracy Camp  Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
Michael Colagrosso  Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 68,   Downloads (12 Months): 557,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1096166.1096174
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Simulation is the research tool of choice for a majority of the mobile ad hoc network (MANET) community. However, while the use of simulation has increased, the credibility of the simulation results has decreased. To determine the state of MANET simulation studies, we surveyed the 2000-2005 proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). From our survey, we found significant shortfalls. We present the results of our survey in this paper. We then summarize common simulation study pitfalls found in our survey. Finally, we discuss the tools available that aid the development of rigorous simulation studies. We offer these results to the community with the hope of improving the credibility of MANET simulation-based studies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Bagrodia and M. Takai. Position paper on validation of network simulation models. Computer Science Department of University of California, Los Angeles, 1999.
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
8
 
9
Association for Computing Machinery. The ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). URL: http://www.sigmobile.org/mobihoc. Page accessed on April 23, 2005.
 
10
 
11
Akaroa Research Group. Akaroa2. URL: http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/research/ns2_akaroa-2/ns.html. Page accessed on April 21, 2005.
 
12
The VINT Group. Ns-users mailing list. http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/nsusers. Page accessed on April 23, 2005.
 
13
J. Heidemann, S. Kumar, and K. Mills. Expanding confidence in network simulations. IEEE Network, September/October:58--63, 2001.
14
15
 
16
D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In Mobile Computing, pages 153--181. 1996.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
J. Liu, L. F. Perrone, Y. Yuan, and D. Nicol. The simulator for wireless ad hoc networks (SWAN). URL: http://www.eg.bucknell.edu/swan/. Page accessed on August 19, 2005.
22
 
23
S. Midkiff. Simulation: Methodology. Presentation to ECE590 class. URL: http://fiddle.visc.vt.edu/courses/ece5984net2/lectures/09_sim.pdf. Page accessed on April 15, 2005.
 
24
D. Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, 2005.
 
25
E. Mota, A. Wolisz, and K. Pawlikowski. Experience with Akaroa: speeding up stochastic simulation using parallel replications. In Proceedings of the High Performance Computing and Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference, pages 296--301, 1998.
 
26
W. Navidi and T. Camp. Stationary distributions for the random waypoint mobility model. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, pages 99--108, 2004.
 
27
The NS manual: formerly known as notes and documentation, 2003. URL: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/. Page accessed on April 21, 2005.
 
28
K. Pawlikowski. Do not trust all simulation studies of telecommunications networks. International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pages 899--908, 2003.
 
29
K. Pawlikowski, J. Jeong, and R. Lee. On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 132--139, 2001.
 
30
K. Pawlikowski, J. Jeong, and R. Lee. Letters to the editor. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 132--139, 2002.
 
31
K. Pawlikowski and V. Yau. Akaroa-2 Manual, 1995. Department of Computer Science, University of Canterbury, ChristChurch New Zealand. URL: http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/research/ns2_akaroa-2. Page accessed on April 21, 2005.
 
32
G. Pei, M. Gerla, X. Hong, and C. Chiang. A wireless hierarchical routing protocol with group mobility. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pages 1538--1542, 1999.
 
33
 
34
The CMU Monarch Project. The CMU monarch extensions to the ns simulator. URL: http://www.monarch.cs.cmu.edu/. Page accessed on April 25, 2005.
 
35
The SEACORN Project. SEACORN simulation tools. URL: http://seacorn.ptinovacao.pt/sim_tools.html. Page accessed on April 23, 2005.
 
36
E. Royer, P. M. Melliar-Smith, and L. Moser. An analysis of the optimum node density for ad hoc mobile networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pages 857--861, 2001.
37
 
38
 
39
 
40
L. Schruben. Detecting initialization bias in simulation output. Operations Research, pages 569--590, 1982.
41

CITED BY  33

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stuart Kurkowski: colleagues
Tracy Camp: colleagues
Michael Colagrosso: colleagues