ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Detection and prevention of stack buffer overflow attacks
Full text HtmlHtml (32 KB),  PdfPdf (825 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 48 ,  Issue 11  (November 2005) table of contents
Pages: 50 - 56  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Benjamin A. Kuperman  Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA
Carla E. Brodley  Tufts University, Medford, MA
Hilmi Ozdoganoglu  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
T. N. Vijaykumar  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Ankit Jalote  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 57,   Downloads (12 Months): 440,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1096000.1096004
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

How to mitigate remote attacks that exploit buffer overflow vulnerabilities on the stack and enable attackers to take control of the program.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aleph One. Smashing the stack for fun and Profit. Phrack Magazine 7, 49 (Fall 1997); www.phrack.com/.
 
2
Baratloo, A., Singh, N., and Tsai, T. Transparent fun-time defense against stack smashing attacks. In Proceedings of the 2000 USENIX Technical Conference (San Diego, CA, June 2000).
 
3
 
4
Cowan, C., Pu, C., Maier, D., Hinton, H., Bakke, P., Beattie, S., Grier, A., Wagle, P., and Zhang, Q. StackGuard: Automatic adaptive detection and prevention of buffer-overflow attacks. In Proceedings of the Seventh USENIX Security Conference (San Antonio, TX, Jan. 1998).
 
5
 
6
 
7
Larochelle, D. and Evans, D. Statically detecting likely buffer overflow vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of the 2001 USENIX Security Symposium (Aug. 2001).
8
 
9
Newsham, T. Format String Attacks. White paper, Guardent, Inc., Sept. 2000; www.lava.net/~newsham/format-string-attacks.pdf.
 
10
Ozdoganoglu, H., Brodley, C., Vijaykumar, T., Jalote, A., and Kuperman, B. SmashGuard: A Hardware Solution to Prevent Security Attacks on the Function Return Address. Tech. Rep. TR-ECE 03-13, Purdue University School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nov. 2003; www.smashguard.org/.
 
11
Prasad, M. and Chiueh, T. A binary rewriting defense against stack-based buffer overflow attacks. In Proceedings of the 2003 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (San Antonio, TX, June 2003).
 
12
Xu, J., Kalbarczyk, Z., Patel, S., and Iyer, R. Architecture support for defending against buffer overflow attacks. In Proceedings of the 2002 Workshop on Evaluating and Architecting System dependabilitY (EASY-2002) (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Oct. 2002).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Benjamin A. Kuperman: colleagues
Carla E. Brodley: colleagues
Hilmi Ozdoganoglu: colleagues
T. N. Vijaykumar: colleagues
Ankit Jalote: colleagues