|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
In addition to the intellectual effort, information security lab development can require substantial organizational budget and labor commitments. For example, obtaining commercial security software necessitates a significant budget commitment. In an analogous manner, installing security software, setting up user accounts, and configuring lab systems can require a significant labor commitment. In many academic environments, obtaining the necessary budget and labor commitments for effective 'Hands On' information security lab modules is problematic.To mitigate these problems, we developed a security lab development framework with specific technological and pedagogical attributes. These attributes were specifically chosen to mitigate the previously identified constraints. Specifically, two technological attributes and one pedagogical attribute identify the framework. The two technological attributes are the utilization of Open Source Tools and the utilization of LiveCDs. The pedagogical attribute is the utilization of Kolb's Experiential Learning Model. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
General Terms:
REVIEW
"Lee Imrey : Reviewer"
This paper discusses how new technologies can be used in a training lab for the field of information security, and how the lab can facilitate learning in the learning modes described in Kolb's experiential learning model (concrete experience, abst
more...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||