ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
ABET accreditation with IT criteria
Full text PdfPdf (215 KB)
Source Conference On Information Technology Education (formerly CITC) archive
Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology education table of contents
Newark, NJ, USA
SESSION: Special session table of contents
Pages: 353 - 359  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-252-6
Authors
C. Richard G. Helps  Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
Barry M. Lunt  Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
David K. Anthony  Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGITE: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Technology Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1095714.1095716
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In recent years the SIGITE community has invested significant effort into developing IT accreditation standards. New draft general and program specific accreditation criteria were recently created. The Brigham Young University IT program is undergoing an accreditation visit in the near future as a pilot program. Although the IT criteria have not yet been approved by ABET they have been used by the Brigham Young University program in preparing for accreditation and will be considered by the accreditation evaluators in the accreditation visit. This paper will describe the experience of preparing for an ABET IT accreditation visit using the draft standards. Issues of continuous improvement, assessment and accreditation documentation will be discussed. Methods for collecting and presenting accreditation data will be presented. The selection of program objectives related to institution objectives is discussed, as is the link between course outcomes and program outcomes and objectives. The linkage between accreditation criteria and the model curriculum is also discussed. This work follows on from previous work that has been reported elsewhere. Thus there is some overlap with previous papers by one or more of the authors, as well as new work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aims of a BYU Education, http://unicomm.byu.edu/about/aims/ Accessed January 2005
 
2
 
3
Joint Task Force for Computing Curricula 2004 Computing Curricula 2004 Overview Report including A Guide to Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computing for undergraduate degree programs in Computer Engineering, Computer Science, Information Systems, Information Technology, Software Engineering The Association for Computing (ACM), The Association for Information Systems (AIS), The Computer Society (IEEE-CS) http://www.acm.org/education/Overview_Draft_11-22-04.pdf
 
4
Joint Task Force on Engineering Education Assessment A Framework for the Assessment of Engineering Education, ASEE Prism, v5, p18-20+ My/Je '96 1996, Accessed at http://asee.org/resources/assessmentwhitepaper.cfm)
 
5
Lattuca, L. R., Strauss, L. C., and Volkwein, J. F. (2005) Getting in Sync: Faculty and Employer Perceptions from the National Study of EC2000. Proceedings of Mudd Design Workshop V Learning and Engineering Design Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA.
6
 
7
Lidtke, Doris K, Saperstein, L., Martin, K. Integration of CSAB and ABET 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2000. FIE 2000. 2 vol.623+596, Kansas City, MO
 
8
 
9
MIT, Mission of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, http://www.mit.edu/mission.html, Accessed January 2005
 
10
Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., and Lattuca, L. R. (2005) Quality Assurance of Engineering Education through Accreditation: The Impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and Its Global Influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 165--184.
 
11
RIT's Vision, http://www.rit.edu/~020www/mission.html, accessed January 2005.
 
12
Volkwein, J. F., Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Strauss, L. C., Sukhbaatar, J. (2004) Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 318-328.
 
13
11. Wankat, Phillip and Oreovicz, Frank. Necessary Evil, ASEE Prism, Nov 2004, p. 44
 
14
Yeargan, Jerry R., The Integration of ABET and CSAB, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 45, No. 2, May 2002, p111--117


Collaborative Colleagues:
C. Richard G. Helps: colleagues
Barry M. Lunt: colleagues
David K. Anthony: colleagues