Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

Automated localization of software bugs is one of the essential issues in debugging aids. Previous studies indicated that the evaluation history of program predicates may disclose important clues about underlying bugs. In this paper, we propose a new statistical model-based approach, called SOBER, which localizes software bugs without any prior knowledge of program semantics. Unlike existing statistical debugging approaches that select predicates correlated with program failures, SOBER models evaluation patterns of predicates in both correct and incorrect runs respectively and regards a predicate as bug-relevant if its evaluation pattern in incorrect runs differs significantly from that in correct ones. SOBER features a principled quantification of the pattern difference that measures the bug-relevance of program predicates.We systematically evaluated our approach under the same setting as previous studies. The result demonstrated the power of our approach in bug localization: SOBER can help programmers locate 68 out of 130 bugs in the Siemens suite when programmers are expected to examine no more than 10% of the code, whereas the best previously reported is 52 out of 130. Moreover, with the assistance of SOBER, we found two bugs in bc 1.06 (an arbitrary precision calculator on UNIX/Linux), one of which has never been reported before.

REFERENCES

• 1: Krzysztof R. Apt , Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog, Verification of sequential and concurrent programs (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1997
• 2: Yuriy Brun , Michael D. Ernst, Finding Latent Code Errors via Machine Learning over Program Executions, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, p.480-490, May 23-28, 2004
• 3: G. Casella and R. Berger. Statistical Inference. Duxbury Press, second edition, 2001.
• 4: Edmund M. Clarke, Jr. , Orna Grumberg , Doron A. Peled, Model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000
• 5: Holger Cleve , Andreas Zeller, Locating causes of program failures, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering, May 15-21, 2005, St. Louis, MO, USA [doi>10.1145/1062455.1062522]
• 6: William Dickinson , David Leon , Andy Podgurski, Finding failures by cluster analysis of execution profiles, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, p.339-348, May 12-19, 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 7: Dawson Engler , David Yu Chen , Seth Hallem , Andy Chou , Benjamin Chelf, Bugs as deviant behavior: a general approach to inferring errors in systems code, Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, October 21-24, 2001, Banff, Alberta, Canada [doi>10.1145/502034.502041]
• 8: Michael D. Ernst , Jake Cockrell , William G. Griswold , David Notkin, Dynamically Discovering Likely Program Invariants to Support Program Evolution, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.27 n.2, p.99-123, February 2001 [doi>10.1109/32.908957]
• 9: Sudheendra Hangal , Monica S. Lam, Tracking down software bugs using automatic anomaly detection, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 19-25, 2002, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/581339.581377]
• 10: M. Harrold, G. Rothermel, K. Sayre, R. Wu, and L. Yi. A empirical investigation of the relationship between spectra differences and regression faults. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability, 10(3):171--194, 2000.
• 11: Monica Hutchins , Herb Foster , Tarak Goradia , Thomas Ostrand, Experiments of the effectiveness of dataflow- and controlflow-based test adequacy criteria, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, p.191-200, May 16-21, 1994, Sorrento, Italy
• 12: James A. Jones , Mary Jean Harrold , John Stasko, Visualization of test information to assist fault localization, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 19-25, 2002, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/581339.581397]
• 13: E. Lehmann. Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Springer, second edition, 1997.
• 14: Ben Liblit , Alex Aiken , Alice X. Zheng , Michael I. Jordan, Bug isolation via remote program sampling, Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, June 09-11, 2003, San Diego, California, USA [doi>10.1145/781131.781148]
• 15: Ben Liblit , Mayur Naik , Alice X. Zheng , Alex Aiken , Michael I. Jordan, Scalable statistical bug isolation, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming language design and implementation, June 12-15, 2005, Chicago, IL, USA [doi>10.1145/1065010.1065014]
• 16: Stephen McCamant , Michael D. Ernst, Predicting problems caused by component upgrades, Proceedings of the 9th European software engineering conference held jointly with 11th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, September 01-05, 2003, Helsinki, Finland [doi>10.1145/940071.940110]
• 17: Madanlal Musuvathi , David Y. W. Park , Andy Chou , Dawson R. Engler , David L. Dill, CMC: a pragmatic approach to model checking real code, Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Operating systems design and implementation

  Due to copyright restrictions we are not able to make the PDFs for this conference available for downloading

  , December 09-11, 2002, Boston, Massachusetts [doi>10.1145/1060289.1060297]
• 18: Andy Podgurski , David Leon , Patrick Francis , Wes Masri , Melinda Minch , Jiayang Sun , Bin Wang, Automated support for classifying software failure reports, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 19: B. Pytlik, M. Renieris, S. Krishnamurthi, and S. Reiss. Automated fault localization using potential invariants. I Proc. of the 5th Int. Workshop on Automated and Algorithmic DebuggingSymp (AADEBUG '03), pages 287--296, 2003.
• 20: M. Renieris and S. Reiss. Fault localization with nearest eighbor queries. I Proc. of the 18th IEEE Int. Conf. on Automated Software Engineering (ASE '03), 2003.
• 21: Thomas Reps , Thomas Ball , Manuvir Das , James Larus, The use of program profiling for software maintenance with applications to the year 2000 problem, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.22 n.6, p.432-449, Nov. 1997 [doi>10.1145/267896.267925]
• 22: Gregg Rothermel , Mary Jean Harrold, Empirical Studies of a Safe Regression Test Selection Technique, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.24 n.6, p.401-419, June 1998 [doi>10.1109/32.689399]
• 23: Willem Visser , Klaus Havelund , Guillaume Brat , SeungJoon Park, Model Checking Programs, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering, p.3, September 11-15, 2000
• 24: Andreas Zeller, Isolating cause-effect chains from computer programs, Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering, November 18-22, 2002, Charleston, South Carolina, USA [doi>10.1145/587051.587053]
• 25: Thomas Zimmermann , Andreas Zeller, Visualizing Memory Graphs, Revised Lectures on Software Visualization, International Seminar, p.191-204, May 20-25, 2001

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.5 Testing and Debugging
          Subjects: Debugging aids

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.5 Testing and Debugging
          Subjects: Diagnostics; Tracing; Testing tools (e.g., data generators, coverage testing)

General Terms:
Algorithms, Experimentation, Reliability, Verification

Keywords:
localization metrics, statistical debugging