ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Lexical relations: enhancing effectiveness of information retrieval systems
Full text PdfPdf (2.08 MB)
Source ACM SIGIR Forum archive
Volume 15 ,  Issue 3  (Winter 1980) table of contents
Pages: 5 - 36  
Year of Publication: 1980
ISSN:0163-5840
Author
Edward A. Fox  Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1095403.1095404
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

One of the essential features of the "Meaning <=> Text" model (MTM) developed by I. A. Mel'chuk et. al. is the special lexicon or ECD ('explanatory and combinatory' dictionary). This component can be thought of as a collection independent thesaurus, and can be applied to improve the effectiveness of an information retrieval system.After outlining the MTM and related work, this paper briefly describes the SMART type of information retrieval system. Applicability of the above-mentioned lexicon to such a system is discussed. In particular, the list of lexical relations included in the ECD is expanded and organized to be more effective for retrieval, partially along the lines suggested by Evens and Smith.Finally, an experimental analysis of the utility of lexical relations in an information retrieval system is discussed. It is shown that lexical relations generally enhance system performance. When all lexical relations are considered in the comparison, the resulting performance is shown, by statistical methods, to make a significant improvement (up to 16.5% at a single recall level); when all lexical relations except for antonyms are considered, the improvement is even greater (up to 20.2% at a single recall level).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Apresyan, Yu. D., I. A. Mel'chuk and A. K. Zholkovsky. 1969. Semantics and Lexicography: Towards a New Type of Unilingual Dictionary. Studies in Syntax and Semantics, ed. by F. Kiefer, 1-33. Dordrecht - Holland: D. Reidel.
 
2
Evens, Martha W. and Radul N. Smith. 1979. A Lexicon for a Computer Question-Answering System. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, Microfiche 83.
 
3
Kempson, Ruth M. 1977. Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
4
Leed, Richard L. and Alexander D. Nakhimovsky. 1979. Lexical Functions and Language Learning. Slavic and East European Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1.
 
5
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
6
Mel'chuk, I. A. 1973. Towards a Linguistic 'Meaning <=> Text' Model. Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, ed. by F. Kiefer, 33--57. Dordrecht - Holland: D. Reidel.
 
7
Mel'chuk, I. A. 1979. Studies in Dependency Syntax. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers, Inc.
 
8
 
9
Tague, Jean M. 1980. User-Responsive Subject Control in Bibliographic Retrieval Systems. Unpublished manuscript.

CITED BY  12