ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Visualizing non-speech sounds for the deaf
Full text PdfPdf (909 KB)
Source ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Assistive Technologies archive
Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility table of contents
Baltimore, MD, USA
SESSION: Designing for individuals with hearing impairment table of contents
Pages: 52 - 59  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-159-7
Authors
Tara Matthews  EECS, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Janette Fong  HCII, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Jennifer Mankoff  HCII, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGACCESS: ACM Special Interest Group on Accessible Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 89,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1090785.1090797
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sounds constantly occur around us, keeping us aware of our surroundings. People who are deaf have difficulty maintaining an awareness of these ambient sounds. We present an investigation of peripheral, visual displays to help people who are deaf maintain an awareness of sounds in the environment. Our contribution is twofold. First, we present a set of visual design preferences and functional requirements for peripheral visualizations of non-speech audio that will help improve future applications. Visual design preferences include ease of interpretation, glance-ability, and appropriate distractions. Functional requirements include the ability to identify what sound occurred, view a history of displayed sounds, customize the information that is shown, and determine the accuracy of displayed information. Second, we designed, implemented, and evaluated two fully functioning prototypes that embody these preferences and requirements, serving as examples for future designers and furthering progress toward understanding how to best provide peripheral audio awareness for the deaf.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Auditory Visual Articulation Therapy Software, Sonido Inc., www.sonidoinc.com.
 
2
SoundForge, Hallogram Publishing, www.hallogram.com.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Elssmann, S.F. and Maki, J.E., Speech spectrographic display: use of visual feedback by hearing-impaired adults during independent articulation practice. American Annals of the Deaf, 132 (4). 276--279.
6
 
7
Malkin, R., et al., First evaluation of acoustic event classification systems in CHIL project. In HSCMA '05 Workshop.
 
8
Oliver, N. and Horvitz, E., Layered Representations for Human Activity Recognition. In Proc. of ICMI '02, 3.
 
9
Senghas, R.J. and Monaghan, L., Signs of Their Times: Deaf Communities and the Culture of Language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31. 69--97.
 
10
Yeung, E., et al., A wearable multichannel tactile display of voice fundamental frequency. Ear Hear, 9 (6). 342--350.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Tara Matthews: colleagues
Janette Fong: colleagues
Jennifer Mankoff: colleagues