An investigation of potential success factors for an introductory model-driven programming course

ABSTRACT

In order to improve the course design of a CS1 model-driven programming course we study potential indicators of success for such a course. We explain our specific interpretation of objects-first. Of eight potential indicators of success, we have found only two to be significant at a 95% confidence interval: math grade from high school and course work. The two significant indicators explain 24.2% of the variation of the exam grade. The result concerning math grade contradicts earlier findings. We discuss four aspects of our research: the explanation power of the potential success indicators, the impact of our findings on teaching, limits of what to conclude from the available data, and the variety of the notion "objects-first". Because of the variety of interpretations of "objects-first", the present research is necessary as a supplement to earlier research in order to make generalizable results on the success factors for objects-first programming.

REFERENCES

• 1: Jens Bennedsen , Michael E. Caspersen, Programming in context: a model-first approach to CS1, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 2: Jens Bennedsen , Michael E. Caspersen, Revealing the programming process, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
• 3: Bergin, J. 14 Pedagogical Patterns. Available on-line at "<http://csis.pace.edu/ bergin/PedPat1.3.html>". Last accessed May 13 2005.
• 4: Susan Bergin , Ronan Reilly, Programming: factors that influence success, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
• 5: Brooks, J. H., & DuBois, D. L. (1995). Individual and environmental predictors of adjustment during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 36, pp. 347--360.
• 6: Pat Byrne , Gerry Lyons, The effect of student attributes on success in programming, Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, p.49-52, June 2001, Canterbury, United Kingdom
• 7: Michael E. Caspersen , Henrik Bærbak Christensen, Here, there and everywhere - on the recurring use of turtle graphics in CS1, Proceedings of the Australasian conference on Computing education, p.34-40, December 2000, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/359369.359375]
• 8: Henrik Bærbak Christensen , Michael E. Caspersen, Frameworks in CS1: a different way of introducing event-driven programming, Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 24-28, 2002, Aarhus, Denmark
• 9: Stephen Cooper , Wanda Dann , Randy Pausch, Teaching objects-first in introductory computer science, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 10: Exam score (2005). http://www.retsinfo.dk/_GETDOCM_/~ACCN/B19950051305-REGL <http://www.retsinfo.dk/_GETDOCM_/ACCN/B19950051305-REGL> (English translation can be found in the bottom) Last accessed April 30 2005.
• 11: Annita Fjuk , Ola Berge , Jens Bennedsen , Michael E. Caspersen, Learning Object-Orientation through ICT-Mediated Apprenticeship, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04), p.380-384, August 30-September 01, 2004
• 12: Foster, T. R. (1998). A comparative study of the study skills, self-concept, academic achievement and adjustment to college of freshman intercollegiate athletes and nonathletes. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(12-A), pp. 4565.
• 13: Dianne Hagan , Selby Markham, Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program?, Proceedings of the 5th annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSEconference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, p.25-28, July 11-13, 2000, Helsinki, Finland
• 14: The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula (IEEE Computer Society and Association for Computing Machinery). Computing Curricula 2001 (final report), December 2001. Available on-line at "<http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final>". Last accessed May 13, 2005.
• 15: Jones, R., Boyle, T. & Pickard, P. (2003) Objectworld: Helping Novice Programmers to Succed through a Graphical Objects-first Approach. Proceedings of 4th Annual LTSN-ICS Conference, NUI Galway, pp. 111--114.
• 16: Michael Kölling , John Rosenberg, Guidelines for teaching object orientation with Java, Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, p.33-36, June 2001, Canterbury, United Kingdom
• 17: R. R. Leeper , J. L. Silver, Predicting success in a first programming course, Proceedings of the thirteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.147-150, February 11-12, 1982, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
• 18: John Lewis, Myths about object-orientation and its pedagogy, Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.245-249, March 07-12, 2000, Austin, Texas, United States
• 19: Nielsen, K., Kvale, S. (1997). Current issues of apprenticeship". Nordisk Pedagogik, Vol 17, pp. 130--139.
• 20: Nowaczyk, R. H. (1983). Cognitive skills needed in computer programming. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
• 21: Pritchard, M. E. & Wilson G S. (2003). Using Emotional and Social Factors to Predict Student Success, Journal of College Student Development, Vol 44(1).
• 22: Nathan Rountree , Janet Rountree , Anthony Robins, Predictors of success and failure in a CS1 course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.34 n.4, December 2002 [doi>10.1145/820127.820182]
• 23: Sanders, R. T., Jr. (1998). Intellectual and psychosocial predictors of success in the college transition: A multiethnic study of freshman students on a predominantly White campus. Dissertation Abstracts International Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 58(10-B), pp. 5655.
• 24: Axel Schmolitzky, "Objects first, interfaces next" or interfaces before inheritance, Companion to the 19th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, October 24-28, 2004, Vancouver, BC, CANADA [doi>10.1145/1028664.1028699]
• 25: Szulecka, T. K., Springett, N. R., & de Pauw, K. W. (1987). General health, psychiatric vulnerability and withdrawal from university in first-year undergraduates. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling Special Issue: Counseling and health, 15, pp. 82--91.
• 26: Ting, S. R., & Robinson, T. L. (1998). First-year academic success: A prediction combining cognitive and psychosocial variables for Caucasian and African American students. Journal of College Student Development, 39, pp. 599--610.
• 27: Philip R. Ventura, Jr. , Bina Ramamurthy, On the origins of programmers: identifying predictors of success for an objects first cs1, 2004
• 28: Phil Ventura , Bina Ramamurthy, Wanted: CS1 students. no experience required, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.36 n.1, March 2004
• 29: Wang, M. C. & Haertel, G. D. (1993). What helps students learn? Educational Leadership; Dec93/Jan94, Vol. 51 Issue 4, pp. 74-79.
• 30: Brenda Cantwell Wilson , Sharon Shrock, Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.33 n.1, p.184-188, March 2001

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Information systems education

Keywords:
CS1, course design, model-driven programming, object-oriented programming, objects-first, predictors of success