Examining the role of self-regulated learning on introductory programming performance

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-regulated learning (SRL) and introductory programming performance. Participants were undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computer programming module at a third-level (post-high school) institution. The instrument used in this study was designed to assess the motivations and learning strategies (cognitive, metacognitive and resource management strategies) of college students. The data gathered was analyzed to determine if a relationship existed between self-regulation and programming performance and investigate if SRL could be used to predict performance on the module. The study found that students who perform well in programming use more metacognitive and resource management strategies than lower performing students. In addition, students who have high levels of intrinsic motivation and task value perform better in programming and use more metacognitive and resource management strategies than students with low levels of intrinsic motivation and task value. Finally, a regression model based on cognitive, metacognitive and resource management strategies was able to account for 45% of the variance in programming performance results.

REFERENCES

• 1: S. Bergin and R. Reilly. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on learning to program. In Proceedings of the 17th Workshop on Psychology of Programming, PPIG'05, 2005.
• 2: Susan Bergin , Ronan Reilly, Programming: factors that influence success, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
• 3: Patricia F. Campbell , George P. McCabe, Predicting the success of freshmen in a computer science major, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.11, p.1108-1113, Nov. 1984 [doi>10.1145/1968.358288]
• 4: Brenda Cantwell Wilson , Sharon Shrock, Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors, Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education, p.184-188, February 2001, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
• 5: F. Pajares, S. Brinter, and G. Valiante. Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4):406--422, 2000.
• 6: H. Patrick, A. Ryan, and P. Pintrich. The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males' and females' self-regulating learning. Learning and Individual differences, 11(2):153--171, 1999.
• 7: P. Pintrich. The dymanic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. Advances in motivation and achievement: motivation enhancing environments, 6:117--160, 1989.
• 8: P. Pintrich. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self -regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31:459--470, 1999.
• 9: P. Pintrich and E. DeGroot. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1):33--40, 1990.
• 10: P. Pintrich and T. Garcia. Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 7:371--403, 1991.
• 11: P. Pintrich and B. Schrauben. 'Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks' in 'Student perceptions in the classroom'. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992.
• 12: P. R. Pintrich, D. Smith, T.Garcia, and W. McKeachie. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. technical report 91-b-004. The Regents of the University of Michigan., 1991.
• 13: P. Pokay and P. Blumenfeld. Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: the role of motivation and learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1):41--50, 1990.
• 14: Nathan Rountree , Janet Rountree , Anthony Robins, Predictors of success and failure in a CS1 course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.34 n.4, December 2002 [doi>10.1145/820127.820182]
• 15: B. Zimmerman. Becoming a self-regulated learner: which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology., 11(4):307--313, 1986.
• 16: B. Zimmerman and M. Martinez-Pons. Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82:51--59, 1990.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Human Factors, Measurement, Performance

Keywords:
CS1, predictors, programming, self-regulated learning