ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Students' alternative standards for correctness
Full text PdfPdf (266 KB)
Source International Computing Education Research Workshop archive
Proceedings of the first international workshop on Computing education research table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
Pages: 37 - 43  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-043-4
Author
Yifat Ben-David Kolikant  Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1089786.1089790
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We examined students' definition of correctness as reflected by their decisions whether certain programs are correct. Using a questionnaire we found that students understand correctness as a relative property of the program and therefore might decide that a program is correct even when they evidence its incorrect behavior. We also found that students' definitions of systematic testing are inherently different from that of professionals, yet are consistent with their tolerance to errors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ben-David Kolikant, Y., & Ben-Ari, M. (Submitted). Fertile Zones of Cultural encounter.
 
2
Ben-David Kolikant, Y, & Pollack, S. (2004). Establishing computer science professional norms among high-school students, Computer Science Education, 14, 1, 21--35.
 
3
Ben-David Kolikant, Y., & Pollack, S. (Submitted). Negotiating professional norms with informally technology experienced students: what goes wrong?
4
 
5
Fleury, A. E (1993). Students beliefd about Pascal programming, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(3), 355--371.
 
6
Iftikhar, B. (2004). Including Validation, Verification, and Debugging techniques in UTCS Curriculum, http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/almstrum/cs370/iftikhar/final.html.
 
7
Joni, S., & Soloway, E. (1986). 'But my program runs.' Discourse rules for novice programmers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(1), 95--125.
 
8
9
 
10
Scott, E., Zadirov, A., Feinberg, S., & Jayakody, R. (2003). Proceedings of Informing Science Educational Technology Education Joint conference, Pori, Finland, 957--967.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yifat Ben-David Kolikant: colleagues