ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
HIT and MIS: implications of health information technology and medical information systems
Full text HtmlHtml (30 KB),  PdfPdf (83 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 48 ,  Issue 10  (October 2005) table of contents
The digital society
SPECIAL ISSUE: The digital society table of contents
Pages: 68 - 74  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Peter G. Goldschmidt  World Development Group, Bethesda, MD
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 51,   Downloads (12 Months): 334,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1089107.1089141
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Evaluating the potential advantages and considering the risks associated with electronic health care records.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Brailer D.J. and Terasawa E.L. Use and adoption of computer-based patient records. Oakland, CA. California HealthCare Foundations, 2003.
 
2
Chin, T. Technology valued, but implementing it in practice is slow. American Medical News (Jan. 19, 2004).
 
3
Goldschmidt, P.G., et al. A comprehensive study of the ethical, legal and social implications of advances in biomedical and behavioral research and technology: Summary of the final report. Baltimore, Policy Research Incorporated, 1977.
 
4
Henley R.R. and Wiederhold, G. An analysis of automated ambulatory medical record systems. AARMS Study Group, UCSF, June 1975.
 
5
Institute of Medicine. The computer-based electronic medical record: An essential technology for healthcare. NAP, Washington, DC, 1991 (revised 1997).
 
6
Is IT the cure? Economist (May 8, 2003).
 
7
Moore, R. EMRs delivery benefits, but physician buyers are wary. Nashville Business Journal (Mar. 7, 2005).
 
8
Rash, M.C. Privacy concerns hinder electronic medical records. The Business Journal of the Greater Triad Area (Apr. 4, 2005).
 
9
Riley, D.L. Business models for cost effective use of health information technologies: Lessons learned in the CHCS-II project. Studies in Health Technology Information 92 (2003), 157--165.
 
10
Thompson, T. and Brailer, D. Health IT strategic framework. DHHS, Washington, DC, 2004.