ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Current practices of leading e-government countries
Full text HtmlHtml (30 KB),  PdfPdf (129 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 48 ,  Issue 10  (October 2005) table of contents
The digital society
Pages: 99 - 104  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Sang M. Lee  University of Nebraska--Lincoln
Xin Tan  University of Nebraska--Lincoln
Silvana Trimi  University of Nebraska--Lincoln
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 57,   Downloads (12 Months): 585,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1089107.1089112
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

IT is transforming the way governments function and valuable lessons can be learned from the pioneering e-government programs that have led the charge.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Center for Digital Government. Digital State, Cities and Counties Survey. 2002; www.centerdigitalgov.com/center/02digitalstates.php.
 
2
Chadwick, A. and May, C. Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: "e-Government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: Int. J. Policy Admin. Institutions 16, 2 (2003), 271--300.
 
3
European Commission. eEurope: An information society for all. Communication on a Commission Initiative for the Special European Council of Lisbon (Mar. 23--24, 2000); www.e-europestandards.org/Docs/eeurope_initiative.pdf.
 
4
Government Chief Information Office. The e-Government Action Plan (2000--2003); www.egov.gov.sg/PlansandStrategies/e-GovernmentPlans/e-GovernmentActionPlan/.
 
5
Information Society Office. List of eEurope Benchmarking Indicators. 2000; europa.eu.int/idabc/en/document/3542/5662
 
6
Layne, K. and Lee, J. Developing fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Gov. Inf. Q. 18, 2 (2001), 122--136.
 
7
Lee, S. M. South Korea: From the land of morning calm to ICT hotbed. Acad. Manage. Exec. 17, 2 (2003), 7--18.
8
 
9
Research, Development, and Evaluation Commission. E-government Development in Taiwan. 2003, ngo.cier.edu.tw/trio/tw_e-gov.pdf.
 
10
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Global E-government Readiness Report 2004: Toward Access for Opportunity, (2004); unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan019207.pdf.
 
11
West, D. Global E-government Report: 2002; www.insidepolitics.org/egovt02int.PDF.
 
12
Willemssen, J. Electronic government: Success of the Office of Management and Budget's 25 initiatives depends on effective management and oversight. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census, Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives. 2003. GAO-03-495T.

CITED BY  12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sang M. Lee: colleagues
Xin Tan: colleagues
Silvana Trimi: colleagues