Knowledge management for product maturity

ABSTRACT

When a new product is delivered, it seldom meets all customer needs. The mature phase of a product is driven by customer needs. It requires a human-centered development cycle. As a result, the company should be able to listen the voice of its customers. Most industrial companies are driven by engineers and by technology itself. If current technology is to serve all actors of the life cycle of a product, related companies need to change their ways of dealing with maturity. They have to stop being so driven by features and start examining what customers actually do. The concept of customer itself has to be revisited to the point that any person or group who deals with a product (coming from a process) is a customer of those who developed the product. Product maturity and process maturity are usually distinguished. Product maturity is related to end-user satisfaction, i.e., customers. Product maturity deals with user experience. Process maturity is related to designers, developers, maintainers and other actors who have an impact on the making and evolution of the product. Process maturity deals with organizations, communities and teams involved in the production of a product. This paper proposes an integrated approach to product and process maturity that involves the use of active design documents to support the description of what the product is, how it is or should be used, why it is designed the way it is and how much it will cost to customers in terms of performance, safety, comfort and other criteria that may be relevant to the product purpose of use.

REFERENCES

• 1: Armengaud F., La Pragmatique, Que sais-je?. Presses Universitaire de France. Paris. 1993.
• 2: Guy A. Boy, Indexing hypertext documents in context, Proceedings of the third annual ACM conference on Hypertext, p.51-61, December 15-18, 1991, San Antonio, Texas, United States [doi>10.1145/122974.122980]
• 3: Guy A. Boy, The Group Elicitation Method: An Introduction, Proceedings of the 9th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop on Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, p.290-305, May 14-17, 1996
• 4: Boy, G.A., Documenting the design process and the solution, Group Report, ACM-DIS'97 Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.
• 5: Guy A. Boy, Active design documents, Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.31-36, August 18-20, 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/263552.263572]
• 6: Boy, G.A., Cognitive function analysis. Ablex, Distributed by Greenwood, CT, 1998.
• 7: Boy, G.A. Theories of Human Cognition: To Better Understand the Co-Adaptation of People and Technology - Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity, in L. Douglas Kiel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, Oxford ,UK, {http://www.eolss.net}, 2002.
• 8: Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Software agents, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997
• 9: Jeff Conklin , Michael L. Begeman, gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.6 n.4, p.303-331, Oct. 1988 [doi>10.1145/58566.59297]
• 10: Levinson S.C., Pragmatics, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 1983.
• 11: MacLean, A., Young, R.M., Bellotti, V. & Moran, T., Questions, options and criteria: Elements of design space space analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6, pp. 201--250, 1988.
• 12: Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J., Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Riedel, 1980.
• 13: Michael J. Muller , Jeanette L. Blomberg , Kathleen A. Carter , Elizabeth A. Dykstra , Kim Halskov Madsen , Joan Greenbaum, Participatory design in Britain and North America: responses to the “Scandinavian Challenge”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.389-392, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108962]
• 14: Donald A. Norman, The invisible computer, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998
• 15: Rittel, H.W.J., Second generation design methods. Interview in Design Method Group Anniversary Report: DMG Occasional paper. Vol. 1, pp5-10, Reprinted in N. Cross, Ed. Developments in Design Methodology, pp. 317--327, Chichester Wiley, 1972.
• 16: Tuomi, I., Corporate knowledge: Theory and practice in intelligent organizations. Helsinki: Metaxis, 1999.
• 17: Wiener, N., The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. New York: Avon Books, 1967.
• 18: Norbert Wiener, Cybernetics, Second Edition: or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, The MIT Press, 1965
• 19: Boy, G.A., Traceability. EURISCO/Airbus Industrie Technical Report no. T-99-060, EURISCO, Toulouse.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
      I.2.1 Applications and Expert Systems

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
        I.2.11 Distributed Artificial Intelligence
      I.2.4 Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
          Subjects: Semantic networks; Representation languages

  J. Computer Applications
  J.6 COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
active design documents, design and development, knowledge management, maturity, user experience