ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Expressive richness: a comparison of speech and text as media for revision
Full text PdfPdf (639 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Pages: 21 - 26  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISBN:0-89791-383-3
Authors
Barbara L. Chalfonte  Bellcore, Morristown, NJ
Robert S. Fish  Bellcore, Morristown, NJ
Robert E. Kraut  Bellcore, Morristown, NJ
Sponsors
Human Factors Soc : Human Factors Society
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 65,   Citation Count: 33
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/108844.108848
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bridwell, L.S. Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 14 (1980), 197-222.
 
2
Butler, J.F. Remedial writers: The teacher's job as corrector of papers. College Compa:i~ion and Communication, 31 (1980), 270-277
 
3
Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R.B., Parrish, S 5q. ~ Weeks, G.D. Studies in inte~ctive communication" I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 14 (1972), 487-509.
 
4
Chapanis, A~, ~a'r~sh, R. N., Ochsman, R.B. ~ Weeks, ~ , Studies in interactive communication" II. The effects ~',~ four communication mode~', ~:, ,'he l~aguistic performance of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 19 (1977),, 101-126.
 
5
Crowley, S. Components of the composing process. College Composition and Communication, 28 (1977), 166-169.
 
6
 
7
Faigley, L. ~ Witte, S.P. Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32 (1981), 400-414.
8
 
9
Farallon Computing Inc. MacRecorder Users Manual. Author, Emeryville, CA, 1981.
 
10
Flower, L. ~ Hayes, J.R. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32 (1981), 365-387.
 
11
Frase, L.T. Creating intelligent environments for computer use in writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, (1987), 212-221.
12
 
13
Gould, J.D. An experimental study of writing, dictating, and speaking. In J. Requin (Ed)., Attention and Performance VII. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1978.
 
14
Gould, J.D. ~ Boise, S.J. (1978). How authors think about their writing, dictating, and speaking. Human Factors, 20 (1978), 495-505.
15
 
16
Katz, R. ~ Tushman, M. Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation in an R&D setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23 (1978), 139-162.
 
17
Kellogg, R.T. Computer ~.~s 'mat writers need. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 17 (1985), 253-258.
 
18
Kiesler, S Siegel, J.~ Mc Guire, T. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (1984), 1123-1134.
 
19
 
19a
Kraut, R.E., Fish, R.S., Root, R.W., ~ Chalfonte, B.L. Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In S. Oskamp ~ S. Spacapan (Eds)., Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 1990.
 
20
Kraut, R.E., Lewis, S.H., ~ Swezey, L. W. Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (1982), 718-731.
 
21
Kroll, B.M. Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 12 (1978), 269-281.
 
22
Mead, G. H. Mind, Self and Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1934..
 
23
Neuwirth, C.M., Kaufer, D.S., Keim, G., ~ Gillespie, T. The Comments program: Computer support for response to writing. Technical Report CECE-TR-3. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University Center for Educational Computing in English, 1988.
 
24
 
25
Schwartz, M. Two journeys through the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 34 (1983), 188-201.
 
26
Sommers, N. Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31 (1980),, 378-388.
 
27
Tushman, M.L. Work characteristics and subunit communication structure" A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (1979), 82-97.
 
28
Williams, E. Experimental comparisons of faceto-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84 (1977), 963-976.

CITED BY  33

Collaborative Colleagues:
Barbara L. Chalfonte: colleagues
Robert S. Fish: colleagues
Robert E. Kraut: colleagues