ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Power optimization for universal hash function data path using divide-and-concatenate technique
Full text PdfPdf (195 KB)
Source International Conference on Hardware Software Codesign archive
Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM/IFIP international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis table of contents
Jersey City, NJ, USA
SESSION: High-level techniques for specific applications table of contents
Pages: 219 - 224  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-161-9
Authors
Bo Yang  Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
Ramesh Karri  Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1084834.1084891
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present an architecture level low power design technique called divide-and-concatenate for universal hash functions based on the following observations: (i) the power consumption of a w-bit array multiplier and associated universal hash data path decreases as O(w4) if its clock rate remains constant. (ii) two universal hash functions are equivalent if they have the same collision probability property. In the proposed approach we divide a w-bit data path (with collision probability 2-w) into two/four w/2-bit data paths (each with collision probability 2-w/2) and concatenate their results to construct an equivalent w-bit data path (with a collision probability 2-w). A popular low power technique that uses parallel data paths saves 62.10% dynamic power consumption incurring 102% area overhead. In contrast, the divide-and-concatenate technique saves 55.44% dynamic power consumption with only 16% area overhead.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
D. A. McGrew. The truncated multi-modular hash function TMMH. In IETF Internet Draft, 2001.
 
4
S.Dharmapurikar, P. Krishnamurthy, T. Sproull, and J. Lockwood. Deep packet inspection using parallel bloom filters. In High Performance Interconnects, pages 614--617, 2003.
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
A. Chandrakasan, S. Sheng, and R. Brodersen. Low-power cmos digital design. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 27(4):473--484, 1992.
 
11
12
 
13
P. Rogaway and T. Shrimpton. Cryptographic hash function basics: Definitions, implications, and separations for preimage resistance, second-preimage resistance, and collision resistance. In Fast Software Encryption, pages 371--388, 2004.
 
14
L. Carter and M. Wegman. Universal hash functions. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 18:143--154, 1979.
 
15
 
16