ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Energy conscious online architecture adaptation for varying latency constraints in sensor network applications
Full text PdfPdf (671 KB)
Source International Conference on Hardware Software Codesign archive
Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM/IFIP international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis table of contents
Jersey City, NJ, USA
SESSION: System-level power estimation and optimization table of contents
Pages: 148 - 153  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-161-9
Authors
Sankalp Kallakuri  Stony Brook University, NY
Alex Doboli  Stony Brook University, NY
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1084834.1084875
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sensor network applications face continuously changing environments, which impose varying processing loads on the sensor node. This paper presents an online control method which adapts the architecture to minimize energy consumption while satisfying varying latency constraints. The method predicts processing load requirements over a finite time window and accordingly adapts the architecture. The behaviour of the hardware modules over time has been approximated with a Continuous Time Markov Process. Adaptive image processing for vehicle tracking was used as a case study for this approach.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
C. G. Cassandras and S. LaFortune. Introduction to Discrete Event Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
 
3
P. Eles, Z. Peng, K. Kuchinski, and A. Doboli. System Level Hardware/Software Partitioning using Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
 
4
E. Feinberg. Optimal control of average reward constrained continuous time finite markov decision processes. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 3805--3810, 2002.
 
5
 
6
S. Kallakuri, A. Doboli, and S. Doboli. Stochastic modeling based environment for synthesis and comparison of bus arbitration policies. Proceedings of IEEE Annual Symposium on VLSI, pages 199--206, 2004.
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
Q. Qiu, Q.Wu, and M.Pedram. Stochastic modeling of a power-managed system: Construction and optimisation. IEEE Transactions on Computer Aided Design, 20(9):1200--1217, October 2001.
 
13
M. Rahimi, R. Pon, W. Kaiser, G. Sukhatme, D. Estrin, and M. Srivastava. Adaptive sampling for environmental robots. Proc. of International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.
14
15
 
16
M. Writhlin and H. B. Disc: The dynamic instruction set computer. fpgas for fast board developement and reconfigurable computing. Proceedings of the SPIE 2607, pages 92--103, 1995.
 
17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sankalp Kallakuri: colleagues
Alex Doboli: colleagues