| An exploration of how comments are used for marking related code fragments |
| Full text |
Pdf
(91 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Software Engineering
archive
Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Modeling and analysis of concerns in software
table of contents
St. Louis, Missouri
SESSION: Modeling and Analysis of Concerns in Software (MACS)
table of contents
Pages: 1 - 4
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-119-8
Also published in ...
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 17, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
A software developer performing a change task to a system very often has to examine a concern that is scattered across the source code of the system. Although many mechanisms attempt to alleviate the problem of dealing with scattered code, many software developers are still using more ad-hoc approaches to mark related code. In this paper, we explore how developers use comments to mark related code. We found that developers use two basic kinds of conventions to mark related code in comments: by explicitly stating relationships in the comment and by using similar comments in related code elements. These conventions have several major issues. However, we observe that using comments to mark related code fragments offers several benefits. We hope that our observations can give insights into building better tool support for scattered code fragments.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Eclipse task tags website. http://127.0.0.1:55317/help/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.user/reference/refpreferences-task-tags.htm.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
William G. Griswold , Jimmy J. Yuan , Yoshikiyo Kato, Exploiting the map metaphor in a tool for software evolution, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, p.265-274, May 12-19, 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
| |
4
|
G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Menhdhekar, C. Maeda, C. Lopes, J.-M. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect-oriented programming. In European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, pages 220--242, 1997.
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
Peri Tarr , Harold Ossher , William Harrison , Stanley M. Sutton, Jr., N degrees of separation: multi-dimensional separation of concerns, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.107-119, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/302405.302457]
|
|