An empirical assessment of using stereotypes to improve reading techniques in software inspections

ABSTRACT

Stereotypes were introduced into the Unified Modeling Language (UML) in order to provide a means of customizing the language for particular needs. The stereotypes can increase the comprehension of UML diagrams and therefor influence reading techniques used for inspections of software artefacts. In this paper we evaluate how the usage of stereotypes in UML designs influences outcomes of three reading techniques used for verification and validation of UML models. The study presented in this paper is done in the context of the UML domain modeling, but the results can be generalized to other kinds of models expressed in UML. The results show that the presence of stereotypes improves the efficiency and effectiveness of the studied methods and shows the magnitude of the improvements. We also investigate which of the reading techniques are the most efficient and effective for analysis of UML designs with stereotypes.

REFERENCES

• 1: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock, Stereotyping: a technique for characterizing objects and their interactions, Object Magazine, v.3 n.4, p.50-53, Nov./Dec. 1993
• 2: Wirfs-Brock R., Wilkerson B., and Wiener L., "Responsibility-Driven Design: Adding to Your Conceptual Toolkit", ROAD, vol. 2, 1994, pp. 27--34.
• 3: Object Management Group, "Unified Modeling Language Specification V. 1.5", Object Management Group, 2003, <u>www.omg.org</u>, last accessed 2003-10-01.
• 4: Atkinson C., Kühne T., and Henderson-Sellers B., "Systematic Stereotype Usage", Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 2, 2003, pp. 153--163.
• 5: Martin Gogolla , Brian Henderson-Sellers, Analysis of UML Stereotypes within the UML Metamodel, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on The Unified Modeling Language, p.84-99, September 30-October 04, 2002
• 6: Staron M., Kuzniarz L., and Wallin L., "Factors Determining Effective Realization of MDA in Industry", In the Proceedings of 2nd Nordic Workshop on the Unified Modeling Language, Turku, Finland. 2004, pp. 79--91.
• 7: Staron M., Kuzniarz L., and Wallin L., "A Case Study on Transformation Focused Industrial MDA Realization", In the Proceedings of 3rd UML Workshop in Software Model Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004.
• 8: An Empirical Study on Using Stereotypes to Improve Understanding of UML Models, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, p.14, June 24-26, 2004
• 9: Staron M., Kuzniarz L., and Wohlin C., "An Industrial Replication of an Empirical Study on Using Stereotypes to Improve Understanding of UML Models", In the Proceedings of Software Engineering Research and Practice in Sweden, Linköping, Sweden, 2004, pp. 53--62.
• 10: Basili V. R., Green S., Laitenberger O., Shull F., Sorumgard S., and Zelkowitz M. V., "The Empirical Investigation of Perspective-Based Reading", Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 1, 1996, pp. 133--64.
• 11: Björn Regnell , Per Runeson , Thomas Thelin, Are the Perspectives Really Different? – FurtherExperimentation on Scenario-Based Reading of Requirements, Empirical Software Engineering, v.5 n.4, p.331-356, December 2000 [doi>10.1023/A:1009848320066]
• 12: Thelin T., Erlansson M., Höst M., and Wohlin C., "Experimentation with Usage-Based Reading", in Esernet 2001-2003, vol. 2765, Lncs, R. Conradi and A. I. Wang, Eds. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 193--207.
• 13: Oliver Laitenberger , Colin Atkinson , Maud Schlich , Khaled El Emam, An experimental comparison of reading techniques for defect detection in UML design documents, Journal of Systems and Software, v.53 n.2, p.183-204, Aug. 31, 2000 [doi>10.1016/S0164-1212(00)00052-2]
• 14: Colin Atkinson , Thomas Kühne, Rearchitecting the UML infrastructure, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), v.12 n.4, p.290-321, October 2002 [doi>10.1145/643120.643123]
• 15: Colin Atkinson , Thomas Kühne , Brian Henderson-Sellers, Stereotypical Encounters of the Third Kind, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on The Unified Modeling Language, p.100-114, September 30-October 04, 2002
• 16: Berner S., Glinz M., and Joos S., "A Classification of Stereotypes for Object-Oriented Modeling Languages", In the Proceedings of The Second International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1999, pp. 249--64.
• 17: Object Management Group, "Unified Modeling Language Specification V. 1.5", Object Management Group, 2003, <u>www.omg.org</u>, last accessed 2004-10-01.
• 18: Kuzniarz L. and Staron M., "On Practical Usage of Stereotypes in UML-Based Software Development", In the Proceedings of Forum on Design and Specification Languages, Marseille, 2002, pp. 262--270.
• 19: Axel Uhl , Horst Lichter, A UML Variant for Modeling System Searchability, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Object-Oriented. Information Systems, p.199-210, September 02-05, 2002
• 20: Fagan M. E., "Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development", IBM Systems Journal, vol. 15, 1976, pp. 182--211.
• 21: Adam A. Porter , Lawrence G. Votta, Jr. , Victor R. Basili, Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.21 n.6, p.563-575, June 1995 [doi>10.1109/32.391380]
• 22: Thurn C., "Verification and Validation of Object Oriented Software Design: Guidelines on How to Choose the Best Method", Master Thesis (MSE-2004-05), Ronneby, Sweden, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2004.
• 23: Staron M., "Experiment on the Role of Stereotypes in UML Based Software Development - Materials", 2003, <u>http://www.ipd.bth.se/mst/Experiment/index.html</u>, last accessed 2003-09-03.
• 24: Miroslaw Staron , Ludwik Kuzniarz , Ludwik Wallin, Case study on a process of industrial MDA realization: determinants of effectiveness, Nordic Journal of Computing, v.11 n.3, p.254-278, September 2004
• 25: Walpole R. E., Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2002.
• 26: Claes Wohlin , Per Runeson , Martin Höst , Magnus C. Ohlsson , Bjöorn Regnell , Anders Wesslén, Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2000

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.5 Testing and Debugging
          Subjects: Code inspections and walk-throughs

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.8 Metrics
          Subjects: Process metrics

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement, Performance