| Experience of introducing reference architectures in the development of automotive electronic systems |
| Full text |
Pdf
(110 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
archive
Volume 30 , Issue 4 (July 2005)
table of contents
SESSION: Software Engineering for Automotive Systems (SEAS)
table of contents
Pages: 1 - 6
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0163-5948
Also published in ...
|
|
Authors
|
|
Ulrik Eklund
|
Electrical & Electronic Systems Engineering (EESE), ELin, Gööteborg, Sweden
|
|
Örjan Askerdal
|
Electrical & Electronic Systems Engineering (EESE), ELin, Gööteborg, Sweden
|
|
Johan Granholm
|
Electrical & Electronic Systems Engineering (EESE), ELin, Gööteborg, Sweden
|
|
Anders Alminger
|
Electrical & Electronic Systems Engineering (EESE), ELin, Gööteborg, Sweden
|
|
Jakob Axelsson
|
Electrical & Electronic Systems Engineering (EESE), ELin, Gööteborg, Sweden
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 38, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The requirements on increasing functionality, quality, and, customisation, while reducing cost has lead to the introduction of an architecture centred development process for electronic systems at Volvo Cars. This process enables better control of system integration and achieving non-functional requirements, such as reusability, understandability, etc. The result of the process is a reference architecture that includes strategies for implementing the balanced requirements, architectural views that provide means for reasoning about all the concerns of all stakeholders, and a top-level design of the architecturally significant parts. The reference architecture guides the design of several projects, and thus, cost is optimised accordingly. The main contribution of this paper is that we present experiences from introducing the architecture centred process. The main conclusions are that disseminating and maintaining the reference architecture actually require more resources than developing it. Furthermore, experience shows it is difficult to create an architecture that enables a lot of different variants that is also strategically useable in the long term.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
AUTOSAR, URL: <u>http://www.autosar.org</u>
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Brownsword, L. and Clements, P., "A Case Study in Successful Product Line Development", Technical Report, CMU/SEI-96-TR-016, 1996.
|
| |
5
|
Casparsson, L., Rajnák, A., Tindell, K. and Malmberg, P., "Volcano a revolution in on-board communications", Volvo Technology Report, 1, 1998.
|
| |
6
|
Heinecke, H. et al., "AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture - An Industry-Wide Initiative to Manage the Complexity of Emerging Automotive E/E Architectures", Proc. Convergence, SAE-2004-21-0042, 2004.
|
| |
7
|
"IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems". IEEE Std. 1471-2000.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Melin, K., "Volvo S80: Electrical system of the future" Volvo Technology Report, 1, 1998.
|
| |
10
|
Reichart, G. and Haneberg, M., "Key Drivers for a Future System Architecture in Vehicles", Proc. Convergence, SAE-2004-21-0025, 2004.
|
| |
11
|
Rhodin, M., Ljungberg, L., and Eklund., U., "A Method for Model Based Automotive Software Development", Proc. Work in Progress and Industrial Experience Sessions, pp. 15--18, 12th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, Stockholm, 2002.
|
|