| Accumulation and presentation of empirical evidence: problems and challenges |
| Full text |
Pdf
(43 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
archive
Volume 30 , Issue 4 (July 2005)
table of contents
SESSION: Realising Evidence-Based Software Engineering (REBSE)
table of contents
Pages: 1 - 3
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0163-5948
Also published in ...
|
|
Authors
|
|
Marcus Ciolkowski
|
University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
|
|
Jürgen Münch
|
Software Engineering (IESE), Sauerwiesen, Kaiserslautern, Germany
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 41, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Understanding the effects of software engineering techniques and processes under varying conditions can be seen as a major prerequisite towards predictable project planning and guaranteeing software quality. Evidence regarding the effects of techniques and processes for specific contexts can be gained by empirical studies. Due to the fact that software development is a human-based and context-oriented activity the effects vary from project environment to project environment. As a consequence, the studies need to be performed in specific environments and the results are typically only valid for these local environments. Potential users of the evidence gained in such studies (e.g., project planners who need to select techniques and processes for a project) are confronted with difficulties such as finding and understanding the relevant results and assessing whether and how they can be applied to their own situation. Thereby, effective transfer and use of empirical findings is hindered. Our thesis is that effective dissemination and exploitation of empirical evidence into industry requires aggregation, integration, and adequate stakeholder-oriented presentation of the results. This position paper sketches major problems and challenges and proposes research issues towards solving the problem.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Vegas, S.; Juristo, N.; Basili, V.: A Process for Identifying Relevant Information for a Repository: A Case Study for Testing Techniques;, In Aurum, A.; Jeffery, R.; Wohlin, C.; Handzic, M. (Eds): Managing Software Engineering Knowledge; Springer-Verlag; Berlin 2003, pp. 199--230
|
| |
6
|
|
|