Protocol synthesis with dialogue structure theory

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Protocol synthesis with dialogue structure theory

Full text

Pdf (293 KB)

Source

International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents

The Netherlands

SESSION: Posters: argumentation and dialog table of contents

Pages: 1329 - 1330

Year of Publication: 2005

ISBN:1-59593-093-0

Authors

Jarred McGinnis	University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
David Robertson	University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
Chris Walton	University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 2

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082473.1082757 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Inspired by computational linguistic approaches to annotate the structures that occur in human dialogue, this paper describes a technique which encodes these structures as transformations applied to a protocol language. Agents can have a controlled mechanism to synthesise and communicate their interaction protocol during their participation in a multiagent system. This is in contrast to the approaches where agents must subscribe to a fixed protocol and relinquish control over an interaction that may not satisfy the agent's dialogical needs.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	N. Asher and A. Gillies. Common ground, corrections and coordination. Argumentation, 17(4):481--512, 2003.
	2	J. Ginzburg. Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In J. Seligman and D. Westerståhl, editors, Logic, Language, and Computation, pages 221--237. CSLI, Stanford, Ca, 1996.
	3	D. Robertson. A lightweight coordination calculus for agent social norms. In Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies, New York, USA, 2004. a full day workshop occuring as part of AAMAS'04.

CITED BY 2

	Lucas Dixon , Alan Smaill , Tracy Tsang, Plans, Actions and Dialogues Using Linear Logic, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, v.18 n.2, p.251-289, April 2009
	Boris A. Galitsky , María P. González , Carlos I. Chesñevar, A novel approach for classifying customer complaints through graphs similarities in argumentative dialogues, Decision Support Systems, v.46 n.3, p.717-729, February, 2009