ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A drosophila for computational dialectics
Full text PdfPdf (223 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
The Netherlands
SESSION: Posters: argumentation and dialog table of contents
Pages: 1263 - 1264  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-093-0
Authors
Simon Wells  University of Dundee, Park Wynd, Dundee, U.K.
Chris Reed  University of Dundee, Park Wynd, Dundee, U.K.
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082473.1082724
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Systems of argumentation or 'computational dialectic' are emerging as a powerful means of structuring inter-agent communication in multi-agent systems. Individual systems of computational dialectic have been suggested and implemented to tackle specific problems but no comprehensive assessment has been made of such systems in general. Metrics by which systems of dialectic can be measured and used to provide justification for the widespread adoption of dialectic systems in inter-agent communication are needed. This paper introduces GC0, which is a scenario for dialectic testing, and the Sweetwater framework, a software implementation of GC0 for automated testing of dialectic.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Ashburner. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989.
 
2
A. Cayley. Open problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 9:148, 1878.
 
3
 
4
C. L. Hamblin. Fallacies. Methuen and Co. Ltd., 1970.
 
5
Calico Jack Ltd. http://www.calicojack.co.uk, 2005.
 
6
Sun Microsystems Ltd. http://java.sun.com, 2005.
 
7
J. D. Mackenzie. Question begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal Of Philosophical Logic, 8:117--133, 1979.
8
 
9
J. McCarthy. Ai as sport. Science, 276(5318):1518--1519, 1997.
 
10
J. McCarthy. Elaboration tolerance, 1998.
 
11
C. Reed and G. Rowe. Araucaria: "software for puzzles in argument diagramming and xml. Technical report, University Of Dundee, 2001.
 
12
C. Reed and D. Walton. Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication. In I. Rahwan, P. Moraitis, and C. Reed, editors, First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 2004.
 
13
H. Simon and J. Schaeffer. The game of chess, 1992.
 
14
D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
 
15
D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue. SUNY series in Logic and Language. State University of New York Press, 1995.
 
16
S. Wells and C. Reed. Formal dialectic specification. In I. Rahwan, P. Moraitis, and C. Reed, editors, First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 2004.