ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Allocating tasks in extreme teams
Full text PdfPdf (458 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
The Netherlands
SESSION: Papers: task and resource allocation I table of contents
Pages: 727 - 734  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-093-0
Authors
Paul Scerri  Carnegie Mellon University
Alessandro Farinelli  University of Rome
Steven Okamoto  Carnegie Mellon University
Milind Tambe  University of Southern California
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 57,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082473.1082584
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Extreme teams, large-scale agent teams operating in dynamic environments, are on the horizon. Such environments are problematic for current task allocation algorithms due to the lack of locality in agent interactions. We propose a novel distributed task allocation algorithm for extreme teams, called LA-DCOP, that incorporates three key ideas. First, LA-DCOP's task allocation is based on a dynamically computed minimum capability threshold which uses approximate knowledge of overall task load. Second, LA-DCOP uses tokens to represent tasks and further minimize communication. Third, it creates potential tokens to deal with inter-task constraints of simultaneous execution. We show that LA-DCOP convincingly outperforms competing distributed task allocation algorithms while using orders of magnitude fewer messages, allowing a dramatic scale-up in extreme teams, upto a fully distributed, proxybased team of 200 agents. Varying threshold are seen as a key to outperforming competing distributed algorithms in the domain of simulated disaster rescue.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
M. Campos, E. Bonabeau, G. Therauluz, and J.-L. Deneubourg. Dynamic scheduling and division of labor in social insects. Adaptive Behavior, 2001.
 
3
C. Castelpietra, L. Iocchi, D. Nardi, M. Piaggio, A. Scalzo, and A. Sgorbissa. Coordination among heterogenous robotic soccer players. In Proceedings of IROS'02, 2002.
 
4
 
5
Dani Goldberg, Vincent Cicirello, M Bernardine Dias, Reid Simmons, Stephen Smith, and Anthony (Tony) Stentz. Market-based multi-robot planning in a distributed layered architecture. In Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata: Proceedings from the 2003 International Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems, volume 2, pages 27--38. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
 
6
 
7
L. Hunsberger and B. Grosz. A combinatorial auction for collaborative planning, 2000.
 
8
Hiraoki Kitano, Minoru Asada, Yasuo Kuniyoshi, Itsuki Noda, Eiichi Osawa,, and Hitoshi Matsubara. RoboCup: A challenge problem for AI. AI Magazine, 18(1):73--85, Spring 1997.
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
13
 
14
Steven Okamoto. Dcop in la: Relaxed. Master's thesis, University of Southern California, 2003.
 
15
Committee on Visionary Manufacturing Challenges. Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020. National Research Council.
 
16
17
 
18
P. Scerri, E. Liao, Yang. Xu, M. Lewis, G. Lai, and K. Sycara. Theory and Algorithms for Cooperative Systems, chapter Coordinating very large groups of wide area search munitions. World Scientific Publishing, 2004.
19
20
 
21
 
22
G. Tidhar, A. S. Rao, and E. A. Sonenberg. Guided team selection. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 1996.
 
23

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul Scerri: colleagues
Alessandro Farinelli: colleagues
Steven Okamoto: colleagues
Milind Tambe: colleagues