ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Modeling and predicting personal information dissemination behavior
Full text PdfPdf (1.11 MB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: Industry/government track paper table of contents
Pages: 479 - 488  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-135-X
Authors
Xiaodan Song  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Ching-Yung Lin  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Belle L. Tseng  NEC Labs America, Cupertino, CA
Ming-Ting Sun  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 206,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1081870.1081925
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a new way to automatically model and predict human behavior of receiving and disseminating information by analyzing the contact and content of personal communications. A personal profile, called CommunityNet, is established for each individual based on a novel algorithm incorporating contact, content, and time information simultaneously. It can be used for personal social capital management. Clusters of CommunityNets provide a view of informal networks for organization management. Our new algorithm is developed based on the combination of dynamic algorithms in the social network field and the semantic content classification methods in the natural language processing and machine learning literatures. We tested CommunityNets on the Enron Email corpus and report experimental results including filtering, prediction, and recommendation capabilities. We show that the personal behavior and intention are somewhat predictable based on these models. For instance, "to whom a person is going to send a specific email" can be predicted by one's personal social network and content analysis. Experimental results show the prediction accuracy of the proposed adaptive algorithm is 58% better than the social network-based predictions, and is 75% better than an aggregated model based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation with social network enhancement. Two online demo systems we developed that allow interactive exploration of CommunityNet are also discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. A. Nardi, S. Whittaker, and H. Schwarz. "It's not what you know, it's who you know: work in the information age," First Mon., 5, 2000.
 
2
D. Krackhardt, "Panel on Informal Networks within Formal Organizations," XXV Intl. Social Network Conf., Feb. 2005.
 
3
D. Krackhardt and M. Kilduff, "Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms," Social Networks, Vol. 24, 2002.
4
 
5
https://www.linkedin.com/home?trk=logo.
 
6
https://www.orkut.com/Login.aspx.
 
7
 
8
N. Lin, "Social Capital," Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001.
 
9
W. Cohen. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~enron/.
 
10
S. Milgram. "The Small World Problem," Psychology Today, pp 60--67, May 1967.
11
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani and T. Winograd. "The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web," Stanford Digital Libraries Working Paper, 1998.
 
16
 
17
S. Wasserman, and P. E. Pattison, "Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*", Psychometrika, 61: 401-- 425, 1996.
 
18
T. A.B. Snijders. "Models for Longitudinal Network Data," Chapter 11 in Models and methods in social network analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
19
 
20
 
21
M. Handcock and D. Hunter, "Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks," XXV Intl. Social Network Conf., Feb. 2005.
 
22
T. Hofmann, "Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis," Proc. of the Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1999.
 
23
 
24
T. Griffiths and M. Steyvers, "Finding Scientific Topics," Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 5228--5235, 2004.
 
25
 
26
A. McCallum, A. Corrada-Emmanuel, and X. Wang, "The Author-Recipient-Topic Model for Topic and Role Discovery in Social Networks: Experiments with Enron and Academic Email," Technical Report UM-CS-2004-096, 2004.
 
27
X. Song, B. L. Tseng, C.-Y. Lin, and M.-T. Sun, "ExpertiseNet: Relational and Evolutionary Expert Modeling," 10th Intl. Conf. on User Modeling, Edinburgh, UK, July 24-30, 2005.
28
 
29
 
30
J. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. "Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering," Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison,WI, July 1998.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xiaodan Song: colleagues
Ching-Yung Lin: colleagues
Belle L. Tseng: colleagues
Ming-Ting Sun: colleagues