ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations
Full text PdfPdf (685 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: Research track paper table of contents
Pages: 177 - 187  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-135-X
Authors
Jure Leskovec  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Jon Kleinberg  Cornell University
Christos Faloutsos  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 44,   Downloads (12 Months): 323,   Citation Count: 58
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1081870.1081893
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

How do real graphs evolve over time? What are "normal" growth patterns in social, technological, and information networks? Many studies have discovered patterns in static graphs, identifying properties in a single snapshot of a large network, or in a very small number of snapshots; these include heavy tails for in- and out-degree distributions, communities, small-world phenomena, and others. However, given the lack of information about network evolution over long periods, it has been hard to convert these findings into statements about trends over time.Here we study a wide range of real graphs, and we observe some surprising phenomena. First, most of these graphs densify over time, with the number of edges growing super-linearly in the number of nodes. Second, the average distance between nodes often shrinks over time, in contrast to the conventional wisdom that such distance parameters should increase slowly as a function of the number of nodes (like O(log n) or O(log(log n)).Existing graph generation models do not exhibit these types of behavior, even at a qualitative level. We provide a new graph generator, based on a "forest fire" spreading process, that has a simple, intuitive justification, requires very few parameters (like the "flammability" of nodes), and produces graphs exhibiting the full range of properties observed both in prior work and in the present study.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
R. Albert and A.-L. Barabasi. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, pages 509--512, 1999.
 
4
R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabasi. Diameter of the world-wide web. Nature, 401:130--131, September 1999.
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
D. Chakrabarti, Y. Zhan, and C. Faloutsos. R-mat: A recursive model for graph mining. In SDM, 2004.
 
9
F. Chung and L. Lu. The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(25):15879--15882, 2002.
 
10
11
12
 
13
B. H. Hall, A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. The nber patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Papers 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Oct. 2001.
 
14
B. A. Huberman and L. A. Adamic. Growth dynamics of the world-wide web. Nature, 399:131, 1999.
 
15
J. S. Katz. The self-similar science system. Research Policy, 28:501--517, 1999.
 
16
J. S. Katz. Scale independent bibliometric indicators. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3:24--28, 2005.
 
17
J. M. Kleinberg. Small-world phenomena and the dynamics of information. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, 2002.
 
18
J. M. Kleinberg, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins. The web as a graph: Measurements, models, and methods. In Proc. International Conference on Combinatorics and Computing, pages 1--17, 1999.
 
19
 
20
 
21
F. Menczer. Growing and navigating the small world web by local content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(22):14014--14019, 2002.
 
22
S. Milgram. The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 2:60--67, 1967.
 
23
M. Mitzenmacher. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions, 2004.
 
24
M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45:167--256, 2003.
25
 
26
U. of Oregon Route Views Project. Online data and reports. http://www.routeviews.org.
27
 
28
S. Redner. Citation statistics from more than a century of physical review. Technical Report physics/0407137, arXiv, 2004.
 
29
M. Schroeder. Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws: Minutes from an Infinite Paradise. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1991.
 
30
D. J. Watts, P. S. Dodds, and M. E. J. Newman. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393:440--442, 1998.
 
31
D. J. Watts, P. S. Dodds, and M. E. J. Newman. Identity and search in social networks. Science, 296:1302--1305, 2002.

CITED BY  58

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jure Leskovec: colleagues
Jon Kleinberg: colleagues
Christos Faloutsos: colleagues