ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A multiple tree algorithm for the efficient association of asteroid observations
Full text PdfPdf (398 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: Research track paper table of contents
Pages: 138 - 146  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-135-X
Authors
Jeremy Kubica  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Andrew Moore  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Andrew Connolly  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Robert Jedicke  University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
Sponsors
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1081870.1081889
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we examine the problem of efficiently finding sets of observations that conform to a given underlying motion model. While this problem is often phrased as a tracking problem, where it is called track initiation, it is useful in a variety of tasks where we want to find correspondences or patterns in spatial-temporal data. Unfortunately, this problem often suffers from a combinatorial explosion in the number of potential sets that must be evaluated. We consider the problem with respect to large-scale asteroid observation data, where the goal is to find associations among the observations that correspond to the same underlying asteroid. In this domain, it is vital that we can efficiently extract the underlying associations.We introduce a new methodology for track initiation that exhaustively considers all possible linkages. We then introduce an exact tree-based algorithm for tractably finding all compatible sets of points. Further, we extend this approach to use multiple trees, exploiting structure from several time steps at once. We compare this approach to a standard sequential approach and show how the use of multiple trees can provide a significant benefit.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Y. Bar-Shalom and X. Li. Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques. Yaakov Bar-Shalom, 1995.
2
 
3
S. Blackman and R. Popoli. Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems. Artech House, 1999.
 
4
A. Gray and A. Moore. N-body problems in statistical learning. In T. K. Leen and T. G. Dietterich, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, 2001.
5
 
6
P. V. C. Hough. Machine analysis of bubble chamber pictures. In International Conference on High Energy Accelerators and Instrumentation. CERN, 1959.
 
7
D. Reid. An algorithm for tracking multiple targets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(6):843--854, December 1979.
 
8
 
9
 
10
S. W. Shaw and J. F. Arnold. Design and implementation of a fully automated oth radar tracking system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Radar Conference, pages 294--298, May 1995.
 
11
J. K. Uhlmann. Algorithms for multiple-target tracking. American Scientist, 80(2):128--141, 1992.
 
12
J. K. Uhlmann. Introduction to the algorithmics of data association in multiple-target tracking. In D. L. Hall and J. Llinas, editors, Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion, pages 3.1--3.18. CRC Press, 2001.
 
13
C. Veenman, E. A. Hendriks, and M. Reinders. A fast and robust point tracking algorithm. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, October 1998.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeremy Kubica: colleagues
Andrew Moore: colleagues
Andrew Connolly: colleagues
Robert Jedicke: colleagues