ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A Bayesian network classifier with inverse tree structure for voxelwise magnetic resonance image analysis
Full text PdfPdf (284 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: Research track paper table of contents
Pages: 4 - 12  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-135-X
Authors
Rong Chen  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Edward H. Herskovits  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sponsors
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 83,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1081870.1081875
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We propose a Bayesian-network classifier with inverse-tree structure (BNCIT) for joint classification and variable selection. The problem domain of voxelwise magnetic-resonance image analysis often involves millions of variables but only dozens of samples. Judicious variable selection may render classification tractable, avoid over-fitting, and improve classifier performance. BNCIT embeds the variable-selection process within the classifier-training process, which makes this algorithm scalable. BNCIT is based on a Bayesian-network model with inverse-tree structure, i.e., the class variable C is a leaf node, and predictive variables are parents of C; thus, the classifier-training process returns a parent set for C, which is a subset of the Markov blanket of C. BNCIT uses voxels in the parent set, and voxels that are probabilistically equivalent to them, as variables for classification of new image data. Since the data set has a limited number of samples, we use the jackknife method to determine whether the classifier generated by BNCIT is a statistical artifact. In order to enhance stability and improve classification accuracy, we model the state of the probabilistically equivalent voxels with a latent variable. We employ an efficient method for determining states of hidden variables, thus reducing dramatically the computational cost of model generation. Experimental results confirm the accuracy and efficiency of BNCIT.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baltimore longitudinal study of aging home page: http://www.grc.nia.nih.gov/branches/blsa/blsa.htm.
 
2
J. Besag. Spatial interaction and statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. Royal Statistical Soc. Series B, 2, 1974.
 
3
 
4
R. R. Bouckaert. Properties of Bayesian network learning algorithms. In R. L. de Mantaras and D. Poole, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 102--109. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.
 
5
 
6
R. Chen and E. H. Herskovits. Graphical-model based morphometric analysis. accepted, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 2004.
 
7
J. Cheng and R. Greiner. Comparing Bayesian network classifiers. In Proceedings of UAI-99, pages 101--108, 1999.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
C. Davatzikos. Mapping of image data to stereotaxic spaces: Application to brain mapping. Hum. Brain mapp, 19:334--338, 1998.
 
13
C. Davatzikos, M. Vaillant, S. Resnick, J. Prince, S. Letovsky, and R. Bryan. A computerized method for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. J. of Comp. Ass. Tomography, (20):88--97, 1996.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
S. Geman and D. Geman. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE. Trans. PAMI, 6:721--741, 1984.
 
18
A. Goldszal, C. Davatzikos, D. Pham, M. Yan, R. Bryan, and S. M. Resnick. An image processing protocol for quanlitative and quantitative volumetric analysis of brain images. J. Comput. Assisted Tomogr, 22:827--837, 1998.
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
E. H. Herskovits, H. Peng, and C. Davatzikos. A Bayesian morphometry algorithm. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 23, June 2004.
 
24
 
25
 
26
D. Koller and M. Sahami. Towards optimal feature selection. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning (ML), pages 284--292, 1996.
 
27
W. Lam and F. Bacchus. Learning Bayesian belief networks: An approach based on the MDL principle. Computational Intelligence, 10:262--293, 1994.
 
28
P. Langley, W. Iba, and K. Thompson. An analysis of Bayesian classifiers. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 223--228, 1992.
 
29
 
30
I. Rish. An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, 2001.
 
31
D. G. Shen and C. Davatzikos. Hammer: Hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, pages 1421--1439, 2002.
 
32
J. Suzuki. A construction of Bayesian networks from databases based on an MDL scheme. In D. Heckerman and A. Mamdani, editors, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 266--273. Morgam Kaufmann, 1993.
 
33
B. Thiesson. Accelerated quantification of Bayesian networks with incomplete data. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 306--311. AAAI Press, 1995.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rong Chen: colleagues
Edward H. Herskovits: colleagues