ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Self-management in chaotic wireless deployments
Full text PdfPdf (262 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
Cologne, Germany
SESSION: 802.11 protocols and usage table of contents
Pages: 185 - 199  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-020-5
Authors
Aditya Akella  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Glenn Judd  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Srinivasan Seshan  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Peter Steenkiste  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 80,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1080829.1080849
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Over the past few years, wireless networking technologies have made vast forays into our daily lives. Today, one can find 802.11 hardware and other personal wireless technology employed at homes, shopping malls, coffee shops and airports. Present-day wireless network deployments bear two important properties: they are unplanned, with most access points (APs) deployed by users in a spontaneous manner, resulting in highly variable AP densities; and they are unmanaged, since manually configuring and managing a wireless network is very complicated. We refer to such wireless deployments as being chaotic.In this paper, we present a study of the impact of interference in chaotic 802.11 deployments on end-client performance. First, using large-scale measurement data from several cities, we show that it is not uncommon to have tens of APs deployed in close proximity of each other. Moreover, most APs are not configured to minimize interference with their neighbors. We then perform trace-driven simulations to show that the performance of end-clients could suffer significantly in chaotic deployments. We argue that end-client experience could be significantly improved by making chaotic wireless networks self-managing. We design and evaluate automated power control and rate adaptation algorithms to minimize interference among neighboring APs, while ensuring robust end-client performance.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AccessOne/Network OWS. http://www.strixsystems.com/products/products_main.asp.
 
2
Alcatel AirView Software. http://www.alcatel.com.
 
3
Autocell. http://www.propagatenetworks.com/product/.
 
4
IEEE OUI and Companyid assignments. http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt.
 
5
Intego WI-Fi Locator. http://www.intego.com/wiFiLocator/.
 
6
WI-FI Hotspot locator. http://jiwire.com.
 
7
Wi-Fi-Zones.com - Find more hotspot locations. http://www.wi-fi-zones.com.
 
8
WiFiMaps.com - Wardriving Maps and Hotspot Locator. http://www.wifimaps.com.
9
10
11
 
12
13
 
14
Datacomm Research. New Datacomm Research Report: Wireless LAN Equipment Shipments to Triple Within Five Years. http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2005/Feb/1120138.htm, 2005.
15
 
16
R. Droms. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol. Technical report, Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1997. RFC 2131.
 
17
Global Mobile Information Systems Simulation Library. http://pcl.cs.ucla.edu/projects/glomosim/.
 
18
A. Hills. Large-Scale Wireless LAN Design. IEEE Communications, 39(11):98--104, November 2001.
19
20
 
21
Instat/MDR. 3Q 2004 WLAN Market Share Report. http://www.instat.com/r/nrep/2004/IN0401429WL.htm.
 
22
Intel Research Seattle. Place Lab: A Privacy-Observant Location System. http://placelab.org/, 2004.
 
23
G. Judd and P. Steenkiste. Using Emulation to Understand and Improve Wireless Networks and Applications. In Proceedings of NSDI 2005, Boston, MA, May 2005.
 
24
V. Kawadia and P. R. Kumar. Principles and Protocols for Power Control in Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2005.
 
25
R. R. Kompella and A. C. Snoeren. SPARTA: Scheduled Power and Rate Adaptation. In ACM SenSys 2003.
 
26
 
27
J. Malinen. Host AP Driver. http://hostap.epitest.fi/.
28
29
 
30
 
31
J. Rexford, A. Greenberg, G. Hjalmtysson, D. M. A. Myers, G. Xie, J. Zhan, and H. Zhang. Network-wide Decision Making: Toward A Wafer-Thin Control Plane. In HotNets-III, San Diego, CA, November 2004.
32
 
33
A. Santhanam and R. Cruz. Optimal Routing, Link Scheduling and Power Control in Multi-hop Wireless Networks. In Infocom '03. IEEE, March 2003.
 
34
S. Thomson and T. Narten. IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration. Technical report, Internet Engineering Task Force, December 1998. RFC 2462.
 
35
V. van der Vegt. Auto Rate Fallback. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~vdvegt/docs/gron/node24.html.
 
36
IETF Zero Configuration Networking (zeroconf) Working Group. http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/zeroconf-charter.html, 2000.

CITED BY  32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Aditya Akella: colleagues
Glenn Judd: colleagues
Srinivasan Seshan: colleagues
Peter Steenkiste: colleagues